On the validity of the Stokes-Einstein relation for various water force fields

被引:22
|
作者
Tsimpanogiannis, Ioannis N. [1 ]
Jamali, Seyed Hossein [2 ]
Economou, Ioannis G. [3 ]
Vlugt, Thijs J. H. [2 ]
Moultos, Othonas A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Res & Technol Hellas CERTH Thermi Thessalonik, CPERI, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Engn Thermodynam Proc & Energy Dept, Fac Mech Maritime & Mat Engn, Leeghwaterstr 39, NL-2628 CB Delft, Netherlands
[3] Texas A&M Univ Qatar, Chem Engn Program, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Water; self-diffusivity; shear viscosity; molecular dynamics; Stokes-Einstein relation; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; SUPERCOOLED WATER; SELF-DIFFUSION; PRESSURE-DEPENDENCE; WIDE-RANGE; RELAXATION; VISCOSITY; MODEL; H2O; TEMPERATURES;
D O I
10.1080/00268976.2019.1702729
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The translational self-diffusion coefficient and the shear viscosity of water are related by the fractional Stokes-Einstein relation. We report extensive novel molecular dynamics simulations for the self-diffusion coefficient and the shear viscosity of water. The SPC/E and TIP4P/2005 water models are used in the temperature range 220-560 K and at 1 or 1,000 bar. We compute the fractional exponents t, and s that correspond to the two forms of the fractional Stokes-Einstein relation and respectively. We analyse other available experimental and numerical simulation data. In the current analysis two temperature ranges are considered (above or below 274 K) and in both cases deviations from the Stokes-Einstein relation are observed with different values for the fractional exponents obtained for each temperature range. For temperatures above 274 K, both water models perform comparably, while for temperatures below 274 K TIP4P/2005 outperforms SPC/E. This is a direct result of the ability of TIP4P/2005 to predict water densities more accurately and thus predict more accurately the water self-diffusion coefficient and the shear viscosity. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 10
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stokes-Einstein relation for pure simple fluids
    Cappelezzo, M.
    Capellari, C. A.
    Pezzin, S. H.
    Coelho, L. A. F.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 126 (22):
  • [22] Tests of the Stokes-Einstein Relation through the Shear Viscosity Activation Energy of Water
    Mendis, Camilla H.
    Piskulich, Zeke A.
    Thompson, Ward H.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2019, 123 (27): : 5857 - 5865
  • [23] Breakdown of the Stokes-Einstein relation in supercooled water: the jump-diffusion perspective
    Dubey, Vikas
    Dueby, Shivam
    Daschakraborty, Snehasis
    PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 23 (36) : 19964 - 19986
  • [24] Dynamics of Methanol in Ionic Liquids: Validity of the Stokes-Einstein and Stokes-Einstein-Debye Relations
    Herold, Elisabeth
    Strauch, Matthias
    Michalik, Dirk
    Appelhagen, Andreas
    Ludwig, Ralf
    CHEMPHYSCHEM, 2014, 15 (14) : 3040 - 3048
  • [25] Identifying time scales for violation/preservation of Stokes-Einstein relation in supercooled water
    Kawasaki, Takeshi
    Kim, Kang
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2017, 3 (08):
  • [26] Molecular insights into the boundary conditions in the Stokes-Einstein relation
    Ishii, Yoshiki
    Ohtori, Norikazu
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2016, 93 (05)
  • [27] Unusual behavior of Stokes-Einstein relation in liquid mixtures
    Das, Arya
    Ali, Sk. Musharaf
    AIP ADVANCES, 2020, 10 (04)
  • [28] Stokes-Einstein Relation in Pure Alkali Metals and their Alloys
    Wax J.-F.
    Harchaoui N.
    Xu H.
    Defect and Diffusion Forum, 2022, 420 : 205 - 214
  • [29] Appearance of a fractional Stokes-Einstein relation in water and a structural interpretation of its onset
    Xu, Limei
    Mallamace, Francesco
    Yan, Zhenyu
    Starr, Francis W.
    Buldyrev, Sergey V.
    Stanley, H. Eugene
    NATURE PHYSICS, 2009, 5 (08) : 565 - 569
  • [30] Stokes-Einstein relation in supercooled aqueous solutions of glycerol
    Chen, B
    Sigmund, EE
    Halperin, WP
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2006, 96 (14)