Pushing the accuracy limit of shape complementarity for protein-protein docking

被引:27
|
作者
Yan, Yumeng [1 ]
Huang, Sheng-You [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Phys, Luoyu Rd 1037, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Molecular docking; Shape complementarity; Protein-protein Interactions; Scoring function; Fast-Fourier transform; MOLECULAR-SURFACE RECOGNITION; SOFT DOCKING; CAPRI; ELECTROSTATICS; OPTIMIZATION; REFINEMENT; PRINCIPLES; PREDICTION; INTERFACES; COMPLEXES;
D O I
10.1186/s12859-019-3270-y
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Protein-protein docking is a valuable computational approach for investigating protein-protein interactions. Shape complementarity is the most basic component of a scoring function and plays an important role in protein-protein docking. Despite significant progresses, shape representation remains an open question in the development of protein-protein docking algorithms, especially for grid-based docking approaches. Results: We have proposed a new pairwise shape-based scoring function (LSC) for protein-protein docking which adopts an exponential form to take into account long-range interactions between protein atoms. The LSC scoring function was incorporated into our FFT-based docking program and evaluated for both bound and unbound docking on the protein docking benchmark 4.0. It was shown that our LSC achieved a significantly better performance than four other similar docking methods, ZDOCK 2.1, MolFit/G, GRAMM, and FTDock/G, in both success rate and number of hits. When considering the top 10 predictions, LSC obtained a success rate of 51.71% and 6.82% for bound and unbound docking, respectively, compared to 42.61% and 4.55% for the second-best program ZDOCK 2.1. LSC also yielded an average of 8.38 and 3.94 hits per complex in the top 1000 predictions for bound and unbound docking, respectively, followed by 6.38 and 2.96 hits for the second-best ZDOCK 2.1. Conclusions: The present LSC method will not only provide an initial-stage docking approach for post-docking processes but also have a general implementation for accurate representation of other energy terms on grids in protein-protein docking.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A protein-protein docking benchmark
    Chen, R
    Mintseris, J
    Janin, J
    Weng, ZP
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 52 (01): : 88 - 91
  • [22] ELECTROSTATICS IN PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING
    Eisenstein, M.
    Heifetz, A.
    Katchalski-Katzir, E.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 1999, 55 : 96 - 96
  • [23] Electrostatics in protein-protein docking
    Heifetz, A
    Katchalski-Katzir, E
    Eisenstein, M
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2002, 11 (03) : 571 - 587
  • [24] Flexible protein-protein docking
    Bonvin, AM
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (02) : 194 - 200
  • [25] Shape complementarity at protein interfaces via global docking optimisation
    Williams, Gareth
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, 2018, 84 : 69 - 73
  • [26] Automatic prediction of flexible regions improves the accuracy of protein-protein docking models
    Xiaohu Luo
    Qiang Lü
    Hongjie Wu
    Lingyun Yang
    Xu Huang
    Peide Qian
    Gang Fu
    Journal of Molecular Modeling, 2012, 18 : 2199 - 2208
  • [27] Automatic prediction of flexible regions improves the accuracy of protein-protein docking models
    Luo, Xiaohu
    Lu, Qiang
    Wu, Hongjie
    Yang, Lingyun
    Huang, Xu
    Qian, Peide
    Fu, Gang
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING, 2012, 18 (05) : 2199 - 2208
  • [28] A novel volumetric criterion for optimal shape matching of surfaces for protein-protein docking
    Voruganti, Hari K.
    Dasgupta, Bhaskar
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 5 (02) : 180 - 190
  • [29] The impact of protein flexibility on protein-protein docking
    Ehrlich, LP
    Nilges, M
    Wade, RC
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 58 (01) : 126 - 133
  • [30] Protein-protein association kinetics and protein docking
    Camacho, CJ
    Vajda, S
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (01) : 36 - 40