Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci for Tolerance to Pythium irregulare in Soybean (Glycine max L.)

被引:15
作者
Lin, Feng [1 ]
Wani, Shabir H. [1 ,2 ]
Collins, Paul J. [1 ]
Wen, Zixiang [1 ]
Gu, Cuihua [1 ]
Chilvers, Martin I. [1 ]
Wang, Dechun [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Soil & Microbial Sci, 1066 Bogue St,Rm A384-E, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Sher E Kashmir Univ Agr Sci & Technol Kashmir, Mt Res Ctr Field Crops, Anantnag 192101, J&K, India
来源
G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS | 2018年 / 8卷 / 10期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Pythium irregulare; Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping; Single Nucleotide Polymorphism; DAMPING-OFF; PHYTOPHTHORA-SOJAE; RESISTANCE QTL; LINKAGE MAPS; SEED ROT; AGGRESSIVENESS; APHANIDERMATUM; SENSITIVITY; GENES; CORN;
D O I
10.1534/g3.118.200368
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Pythium root rot is one of the significant diseases of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) in the United States. The causal agent of the disease is a soil-borne oomycete pathogen Pythium irregulare, the most prevalent and aggressive species of Pythium in North Central United States. However, few studies have been conducted in soybean for the identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for tolerance to P. irregulare. In this study, two recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations (designated as POP1 and POP2) were challenged with P. irregulare (isolate CMISO2-5-14) in a greenhouse assay. POP1 and POP2 were derived from 'E09014' x 'E05226-T' and 'E05226-T' x 'E09088', and contained 113 and 79 lines, respectively. Parental tests indicated that 'E05226-T' and 'E09014' were more tolerant than 'E09088', while 'E09088' was highly susceptible to the pathogen. The disease indices, root weight of inoculation (RWI) and ratio of root weight (RRW) of both populations showed near normal distributions, with transgressive segregation, suggesting the involvement of multiple QTL from both parents contributed to the tolerance. All the lines were genotyped using Illumina Infinium BARCSoySNP6K iSelect BeadChip and yielded 1373 and 1384 polymorphic markers for POP1 and POP2, respectively. Notably, despite high density, polymorphic markers coverage was incomplete in some genomic regions. As such, 28 and 37 linkage groups were obtained in POP1 and POP2, respectively corresponding to the 20 soybean chromosomes. Using RRW, one QTL was identified in POP1 on Chromosome 20 that explained 12.7-13.3% of phenotypic variation. The desirable allele of this QTL was from 'E05226-T'. Another QTL was found in POP2 on Chromosome 11. It explained 15.4% of the phenotypic variation and the desirable allele was from 'E09088'. However, no QTL were identified using RWI in either population. These results supported that RRW was more suitable to be used to evaluate P. irregulare tolerance in soybean.
引用
收藏
页码:3155 / 3161
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Akond M., 2013, Journal of Plant Genome Sciences, V1, P80, DOI 10.5147/pggb.v1i3.154
  • [2] [Anonymous], J HEREDITY
  • [3] [Anonymous], PLANT HLTH PROG
  • [4] [Anonymous], KEYS TO PYTHIUM
  • [5] [Anonymous], CHARACTERISTICS FUNG
  • [6] [Anonymous], INFLUENCE SOYBEAN CU
  • [7] Mapping QTLs for plant height and flowering time in a Chinese summer planting soybean RIL population
    Cao, Yongce
    Li, Shuguang
    He, Xiaohong
    Chang, Fangguo
    Kong, Jiejie
    Gai, Junyi
    Zhao, Tuanjie
    [J]. EUPHYTICA, 2017, 213 (02)
  • [8] CHURCHILL GA, 1994, GENETICS, V138, P963
  • [9] Copy Number Variation of Multiple Genes at Rhg1 Mediates Nematode Resistance in Soybean
    Cook, David E.
    Lee, Tong Geon
    Guo, Xiaoli
    Melito, Sara
    Wang, Kai
    Bayless, Adam M.
    Wang, Jianping
    Hughes, Teresa J.
    Willis, David K.
    Clemente, Thomas E.
    Diers, Brian W.
    Jiang, Jiming
    Hudson, Matthew E.
    Bent, Andrew F.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2012, 338 (6111) : 1206 - 1209
  • [10] Soybean Germplasm Resistant to Pythium irregulare and Molecular Mapping of Resistance Quantitative Trait Loci derived from the Soybean Accession PI 424354
    Ellis, Margaret L.
    McHale, Leah K.
    Paul, Pierce A.
    St Martin, Steven K.
    Dorrance, Anne E.
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2013, 53 (03) : 1008 - 1021