Worst, average or current pain in the brief pain inventory: Which should be used to calculate the response to palliative radiotherapy in patients with bone metastases?

被引:62
作者
Harris, K. [1 ]
Li, K. [1 ]
Flynn, C. [1 ]
Chow, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Sunnybrook Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
bone metastases; brief pain inventory; radiotherapy; response rates;
D O I
10.1016/j.clon.2007.04.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: To determine which pain intensity scale in the Brief Pain Inventory correlates best with functional interference and should be used to calculate the response to palliative radiotherapy. To determine the differences in functional interference scores for patients classified as responders and non-responders to palliative radiotherapy. Patients and methods: All patients referred to the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program for palliative radiotherapy of symptomatic bone metastases were considered for the study. Patients rated the intensity and functional interference of their pain at the irradiated sites according to the Brief Pain Inventory before and 2 months after radiotherapy. Worst, average and current pain scores were correlated with functional interference scores using Spearman rank coefficients. Responders and non-responders to palliative radiotherapy were defined for each pain intensity scale according to the end points specified by the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party. Average differences between responders and non-responders were compared using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: Between May 2003 and June 2005, 199 patients enrolled in the study (102 men and 97 women). Ninety-five patients returned complete questionnaires at 2 months of follow-up. All pain intensity and interference scores for evaluable patients were significantly lower at 2 months (P < 0.0021). Response rates differed depending on the definition of pain intensity. An overall response rate was observed in 66, 58 and 54% of patients for worst, average and current pain, respectively. Worst pain showed the best correlation with functional interference. Responders reported significantly larger decreases in functional interference scores at follow-up in general activity, normal work, enjoyment of life and average functional interference. Conclusion: Worst pain intensity had higher correlations with all functional interference scores except relationships with others. Therefore, we recommend an 11-point scale measuring worst pain to evaluate response rates in future radiotherapy trials. The mean difference from baseline to follow-up in functional interference scores was significantly larger in patients who responded to radiotherapy treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 527
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SAS STAT US GUID VER
[2]  
BLITZER PH, 1985, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V55, P1468, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850401)55:7<1468::AID-CNCR2820550708>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-M
[4]   International consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases [J].
Chow, E ;
Wu, JSY ;
Hoskin, P ;
Coia, LR ;
Bentzen, SM ;
Blitzer, PH .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 64 (03) :275-280
[5]  
Cleeland C. S., 1994, Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, V23, P129
[6]   DEVELOPMENT OF THE WISCONSIN BRIEF PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE TO ASSESS PAIN IN CANCER AND OTHER DISEASES [J].
DAUT, RL ;
CLEELAND, CS ;
FLANERY, RC .
PAIN, 1983, 17 (02) :197-210
[7]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158
[8]   Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Berlin, JA ;
Kinman, JL ;
Strom, BL .
PAIN, 2000, 88 (03) :287-294
[9]   Validation of the brief pain inventory in a Taiwanese population [J].
Ger, LP ;
Ho, ST ;
Sun, WZ ;
Wang, MS ;
Cleeland, CS .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 18 (05) :316-322
[10]   Questionnaire validation: A brief guide for readers of the research literature [J].
Jensen, MP .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2003, 19 (06) :345-352