Machine learning for prediction of septic shock at initial triage in emergency department

被引:55
作者
Kim, Joonghee [1 ]
Chang, HyungLan [2 ]
Kim, Doyun [1 ]
Jang, Dong-Hyun [1 ]
Park, Inwon [1 ]
Kim, Kyuseok [3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, 166 Gumi Ro, Gyeonggi Do 463707, Seongnam Si, South Korea
[2] CHA Univ, Bundang Hosp, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, 59 Yatap Ro, Gyeonggi Do 463712, Seongnam Si, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Sepsis; Septic shock; Machine learning; Clinical decision support tool; Prediction; Diagnosis; Emergency department triage tool; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; SEVERE SEPSIS; MORTALITY; RISK; REGRESSION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.09.024
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: We hypothesized utilizing machine learning (ML) algorithms for screening septic shock in ED would provide better accuracy than qSOFA or MEWS. Methods: The study population was adult (>= 20 years) patients visiting ED for suspected infection. Target event was septic shock within 24 h after arrival. Demographics, vital signs, level of consciousness, chief complaints (CC) and initial blood test results were used as predictors. CC were embedded into 16-dimensional vector space using singular value decomposition. Six base learners including support vector machine, gradient-boosting machine, random forest, multivariate adaptive regression splines and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and ridge regression and their ensembles were tested. We also trained and tested MLP networks with various setting. Results: A total of 49,560 patients were included and 4817 (9.7%) had septic shock within 24 h. All ML classifiers significantly outperformed qSOFA score, MEWS and their age-sex adjusted versions with their AUROC ranging from 0.883 to 0.929. The ensembles of the base classifiers showed the best performance and addition of CC embedding was associated with statistically significant increases in performance. Conclusions: ML classifiers significantly outperforms clinical scores in screening septic shock at ED triage. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 170
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[31]  
Shimabukuro DW, 2017, BMJ OPEN RESPIR RES, V4, DOI 10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000234
[32]  
Singer M, 2016, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V315, P801, DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.0287
[33]   Non-invasive classification of severe sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome using a nonlinear support vector machine: a preliminary study [J].
Tang, Collin H. H. ;
Middleton, Paul M. ;
Savkin, Andrey V. ;
Chan, Gregory S. H. ;
Bishop, Sarah ;
Lovell, Nigel H. .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2010, 31 (06) :775-793
[34]   Early Prediction of Septic Shock in Hospitalized Patients [J].
Thiel, Steven W. ;
Rosini, Jamie M. ;
Shannon, William ;
Doherty, Joshua A. ;
Micek, Scott T. ;
Kollef, Marin H. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2010, 5 (01) :19-25
[35]   Early increases in microcirculatory perfusion during protocol-directed resuscitation are associated with reduced multi-organ failure at 24 h in patients with sepsis [J].
Trzeciak, Stephen ;
McCoy, Jonathan V. ;
Dellinger, R. Phillip ;
Arnold, Ryan C. ;
Rizzuto, Michael ;
Abate, Nicole L. ;
Shapiro, Nathan I. ;
Parrillo, Joseph E. ;
Hollenberg, Steven M. .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 34 (12) :2210-2217
[36]   Emergency department overcrowding: a survey among European neurotrauma centres [J].
Velt, Kimberley Bernadette ;
Cnossen, Maryse ;
Rood, Pleunie P. M. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Polinder, Suzanne ;
Lingsma, Hester F. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2018, 35 (07) :447-448
[37]   Many Emergency Department Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Do Not Meet Diagnostic Criteria Within 3 Hours of Arrival [J].
Villar, Julian ;
Clement, Joseph P. ;
Stotts, Jim ;
Linnen, Daniel ;
Rubin, David J. ;
Thompson, David ;
Gomez, Antonio ;
Fee, Christopher .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 64 (01) :48-54
[38]   Predicting Risk of Suicide Attempts Over Time Through Machine Learning [J].
Walsh, Colin G. ;
Ribeiro, Jessica D. ;
Franklin, Joseph C. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 5 (03) :457-469
[39]   Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data? [J].
Weng, Stephen F. ;
Reps, Jenna ;
Kai, Joe ;
Garibaldi, Jonathan M. ;
Qureshi, Nadeem .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (04)
[40]  
Zhang Y, 2017, IEEE INT CONF BIG DA, P1233, DOI 10.1109/BigData.2017.8258049