What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review

被引:95
作者
Mogasale, Vittal [1 ]
Ramani, Enusa [1 ]
Mogasale, Vijayalaxmi V. [2 ]
Park, JuYeon [3 ]
机构
[1] Int Vaccine Inst, Dev & Delivery Unit, Policy & Econ Res Dept, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Int Vaccine Inst, Dev & Delivery Unit, Dept Epidemiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Int Vaccine Inst, Dev & Delivery Unit, Biostat & Data Management Dept, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
BONE-MARROW CULTURES; FEVER; DIAGNOSIS; COLLECTION; PARATYPHI; EFFICACY; STORAGE; BURDEN; URINE; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1186/s12941-016-0147-z
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Blood culture is often used in definitive diagnosis of typhoid fever while, bone marrow culture has a greater sensitivity and considered reference standard. The sensitivity of blood culture measured against bone marrow culture results in measurement bias because both tests are not fully sensitive. Here we propose a combination of the two cultures as a reference to define true positive S. Typhi cases. Based on a systematic literature review, we identified ten papers that had performed blood and bone marrow culture for S. Typhi in same subjects. We estimated the weighted mean of proportion of cases detected by culture measured against true S. Typhi positive cases using a random effects model. Of 529 true positive S. Typhi cases, 61 % (95 % CI 52-70 %) and 96 % (95 % CI 93-99 %) were detected by blood and bone marrow cultures respectively. Blood culture sensitivity was 66 % (95 % CI 56-75 %) when compared with bone marrow culture results. The use of blood culture sensitivity as a proxy measure to estimate the proportion of typhoid fever cases detected by blood culture is likely to be an underestimate. As blood culture sensitivity is used as a correction factor in estimating typhoid disease burden, epidemiologists and policy makers should account for the underestimation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   RELATIVE SENSITIVITY OF BLOOD AND BONE-MARROW CULTURES IN TYPHOID-FEVER [J].
AKOH, JA .
TROPICAL DOCTOR, 1991, 21 (04) :174-176
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Wkly Epidemiol Rec, V83, P49
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Modern Epidemiology, VSecond
[4]   Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of typhoid fever [J].
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7558) :78-82B
[5]  
Buckle Geoffrey C, 2012, J Glob Health, V2, P010401, DOI 10.7189/jogh.02.010401
[6]   DIAGNOSIS OF TYPHOID-FEVER BY DETECTION OF SALMONELLA-TYPHI ANTIGEN IN URINE [J].
CHAICUMPA, W ;
RUANGKUNAPORN, Y ;
BURR, D ;
CHONGSANGUAN, M ;
ECHEVERRIA, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (09) :2513-2515
[7]  
Crump JA, 2004, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V82, P346
[8]   COMPARATIVE YIELD OF SALMONELLA-TYPHI FROM BLOOD AND BONE-MARROW CULTURES IN PATIENTS WITH FEVER OF UNKNOWN ORIGIN [J].
FAROOQUI, BJ ;
KHURSHID, M ;
ASHFAQ, MK ;
KHAN, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (03) :258-259
[9]   Evaluation of a simple and rapid dipstick assay for the diagnosis of typhoid fever in Indonesia [J].
Gasem, MH ;
Smits, HL ;
Goris, MGA ;
Dolmans, WMV .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 51 (02) :173-177
[10]  
GASEM MH, 1995, TROP GEOGR MED, V47, P164