Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar

被引:19
作者
Zimmerer, Vitor C. [2 ]
Cowell, Patricia E. [1 ]
Varley, Rosemary A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Human Commun Sci, Sheffield S10 2TA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Abt Allgemeine Sprachwissensch, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Syntax; Artificial grammar learning; Individual behavior; Modality; REACTION-TIME-TASK; HUMAN INFANTS; COMPREHENSION; STRATEGIES; SEQUENCES; LANGUAGE; FACULTY; HUMANS;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-010-0039-y
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Artificial grammar learning (AGL) is a widely used experimental paradigm that investigates how syntactic structures are processed. After a familiarization phase, participants have to distinguish strings consistent with a set of grammatical rules from strings that violate these rules. Many experiments report performance solely at a group level and as the total number of correct judgments. This report describes a systematic approach for investigating individual performance and a range of different behaviors. Participants were exposed to strings of the nonfinite grammar A (n) B (n) . To distinguish grammatical from ungrammatical strings, participants had to pay attention to local dependencies while comparing the number of stimuli from each class. Individual participants showed substantially different behavioral patterns despite exposure to the same stimuli. The results were replicated across auditory and visual sensory modalities. It is suggested that an analysis that looks at individual differences grants new insights into the processes involved in AGL. It also provides a solid basis from which to investigate sequence-processing abilities in special populations, such as patients with neurological lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 501
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca's area [J].
Bahlmann, Joerg ;
Schubotz, Ricarda I. ;
Friederici, Angela D. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 42 (02) :525-534
[2]   SYNTACTIC DETERMINANTS OF SENTENCE COMPREHENSION IN APHASIA [J].
CAPLAN, D ;
BAKER, C ;
DEHAUT, F .
COGNITION, 1985, 21 (02) :117-175
[3]  
Christiansen MH, 1999, COGNITIVE SCI, V23, P157, DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog2302_2
[4]  
COHEN MC, 1991, INTRO COMPUTER THEOR
[5]   Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: The learnability of embedded hierarchical structures [J].
de Vries, Meinou H. ;
Monaghan, Padraic ;
Knecht, Stefan ;
Zwitserlood, Pienie .
COGNITION, 2008, 107 (02) :763-774
[6]   A CASE OF SYNTACTICAL LEARNING AND JUDGMENT - HOW CONSCIOUS AND HOW ABSTRACT [J].
DULANY, DE ;
CARLSON, RA ;
DEWEY, GI .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1984, 113 (04) :541-555
[7]   Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate [J].
Fitch, WT ;
Hauser, MD .
SCIENCE, 2004, 303 (5656) :377-380
[8]  
Friederici AD, 2004, TRENDS COGN SCI, V8, P245, DOI 10.1016/S1364-6613(04)00116-0
[9]   Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds [J].
Gentner, TQ ;
Fenn, KM ;
Margoliash, D ;
Nusbaum, HC .
NATURE, 2006, 440 (7088) :1204-1207
[10]  
Goldberg A. E., 2006, Constructions at work