Texture Weighted Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm for 3D Brain MRI Segmentation

被引:1
作者
Lee, Ji Young [1 ]
Kim, Dongyoun [1 ]
Mun, Jin Yeong [1 ]
Kang, Seok [2 ]
Son, Seong Ho [3 ]
Shin, Sung [1 ]
机构
[1] South Dakota State Univ, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[2] Korea Univ, Guro Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Seoul 08308, South Korea
[3] Elect & Telecommun Res Inst, Daejeon 34129, South Korea
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN ADAPTIVE AND CONVERGENT SYSTEMS (RACS 2018) | 2018年
关键词
3D Brain MRI segmentation; Fuzzy C-Means; Clustering; Local Binary Patterns; Feature extraction; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1145/3264746.3264777
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The segmentation of human brain Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) is an essential component in the computer-aided medical image processing research. Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm is one of the practical algorithms for brain MRI segmentation. However, Intensity Non-Uniformity (INU) problem in brain MRI is still challenging to existing FCM. In this paper, we propose the Texture weighted FCM (TFCM) algorithm performed with Local Binary Patterns on Three Orthogonal Planes (LBP-TOP). By incorporating texture constraints, TFCM could take into account more global image information. The proposed algorithm is divided into following stages: Volume of Interest (VOI) is extracted by 3D skull stripping in the pre-processing stage. The initial FCM clustering and LBP-TOP feature extraction are performed to extract and classify each cluster's features. At the last stage, FCM with texture constraints refines the result of initial FCM. The proposed algorithm has been implemented to evaluate the performance of segmentation result with Dice's coefficient and Tanimoto coefficient compared with the ground truth. The results show that the proposed algorithm has the better segmentation accuracy than existing FCM models for brain MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 295
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   A modified fuzzy C-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data [J].
Ahmed, MN ;
Yamany, SM ;
Mohamed, N ;
Farag, AA ;
Moriarty, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2002, 21 (03) :193-199
[2]  
Andre Larroza, 2016, ASSESSMENT CELLULAR, Vi, P13, DOI 10.5772/57353
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1973, Pattern classification
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1981, PATTERN RECOGN
[5]   Twenty new digital brain phantoms for creation of validation image data bases [J].
Aubert-Broche, Berengere ;
Griffin, Mark ;
Pike, G. Bruce ;
Evans, Alan C. ;
Collins, D. Louis .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2006, 25 (11) :1410-1416
[6]   A new improved version of the realistic digital brain phantom [J].
Aubert-Broche, Berengere ;
Evans, Alan C. ;
Collins, Louis .
NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 32 (01) :138-145
[7]   Review of brain MRI image segmentation methods [J].
Balafar, M. A. ;
Ramli, A. R. ;
Saripan, M. I. ;
Mashohor, S. .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2010, 33 (03) :261-274
[8]  
Batista J., 1999, ADAPTIVE GRADIENT BA
[9]   A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies [J].
Bauer, Stefan ;
Wiest, Roland ;
Nolte, Lutz-P ;
Reyes, Mauricio .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (13) :R97-R129
[10]   BRAIN-TUMORS .2. [J].
BLACK, PM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (22) :1555-1564