Preemptive port site local anesthesia in gynecologic laparoscopy: A randomized, controlled trial

被引:32
作者
Ghezzi, F
Cromi, A
Bergamini, V
Raffaelli, R
Crotti, S
Segredini, R
Bolis, P
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, I-21100 Varese, Italy
[2] Univ Insubria, Dept Anesthesiol, Varese, Italy
[3] Univ Verona, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, I-37100 Verona, Italy
关键词
preemptive analgesia; pain; local anesthetic; laparoscopy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2005.03.007
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of preemptive infiltration of port site with local anesthetic on postlaparoscopy pain. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification 1). SETTING: Two university hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 170 women scheduled for gynecologic laparoscopic procedures were randomly assigned to pre-incisional infiltration with ropivacaine (n = 86) or with saline solution (n = 84). INTERVENTIONS: Infiltration with either local anesthetic or placebo was accomplished in each port site before skin incision. All patients underwent standard anesthesia induction and maintenance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Postoperative pain was evaluated with a Visual analogue scale and patient interview at 1, 3, and 24 hours after surgery. No difference was found between groups in pain levels, pain location, or in the site of superficial pain at any of the postoperative time periods. The proportion of women requiring analgesia before discharge was similar in the local anesthetic group and in the saline group (22/86 [25.6%] vs 19/84 [22.6%], p =.72). The analgesic consumption in the first 24 hours after surgery and the time to first analgesic request did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Preemptive infiltration of trocar sites with ropivacaine is not effective in postoperative pain relief. (c) 2005 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 215
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Effects of preemptive analgesia on pain and cytokine production in the postoperative period
    Beilin, B
    Bessler, H
    Mayburd, E
    Smirnov, G
    Dekel, A
    Yardeni, I
    Shavit, Y
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 98 (01) : 151 - 155
  • [2] Cabell C A, 2000, AANA J, V68, P343
  • [3] The effect of intraoperative bupivacaine administration on parenteral narcotic use after laparoscopic appendectomy
    Cervini, P
    Smith, LC
    Urbach, DR
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (11): : 1579 - 1582
  • [4] Control of Orobanche aegyptiaca and O. ramosa in potato
    Goldwasser, Y
    Eizenberg, H
    Hershenhorn, J
    Plakhine, D
    Blumenfeld, T
    Buxbaum, H
    Golan, S
    Kleifeld, Y
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 2001, 20 (05) : 403 - 410
  • [5] The effect of intraperitoneal ropivacaine on pain after laparoscopic excision of endometriosis
    Gordon, SJ
    Maher, PJ
    Hiscock, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2002, 9 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [6] Preemptive analgesia: What do we do now?
    Gottschalk, A
    Ochroch, EA
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 98 (01) : 280 - 281
  • [7] Grube Jennifer O, 2004, JSLS, V8, P15
  • [8] Effects of presurgical local infiltration of bupivacaine in the surgical field on postsurgical wound pain in laparoscopic gynecologic examinations: A possible preemptive analgesic effect
    Kato, J
    Ogawa, S
    Katz, J
    Nagai, H
    Kashiwazaki, M
    Saeki, S
    Suzuki, H
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2000, 16 (01) : 12 - 17
  • [9] A randomized, double-blinded trial of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopy
    Ke, RW
    Portera, SG
    Bagous, W
    Lincoln, SR
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (06) : 972 - 975
  • [10] Keita H, 2003, CAN J ANAESTH, V50, P362, DOI 10.1007/BF03021033