Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task

被引:26
作者
Augustinova, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Silvert, Laetitia [1 ,2 ]
Ferrand, Ludovic [1 ,2 ]
Llorca, Pierre Michel [3 ,4 ]
Flaudias, Valentin [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, Lab Psychol Sociale & Cognit LAPSCO, UMR CNRS 6024, F-63037 Clermont Ferrand, France
[2] Univ Blaise Pascal, F-63037 Clermont Ferrand, France
[3] CHU Clermont Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
[4] Univ Auvergne, Clermont Ferrand, France
关键词
Semantic conflict; Single-letter coloring; Stroop interference; N-inc; Response conflict; INTERFERENCE; COMPONENT; STIMULUS; ERP;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-014-0697-z
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
By combining the semantic Stroop paradigm (e.g., Klein in American Journal of Psychology 77:576-588, 1964) with a single-letter coloring (SLC) procedure (e.g., Besner et al. in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4:221-225, 1997), this research investigated whether the frequently reported Stroop-related event-related potential (ERP) effect arising about 400 ms after stimulus onset (N-inc) is sensitive to the semantic and/or the response conflict. Consistent with our past findings (e.g., Augustinova et al. in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17:827-833, 2010), SLC speeded up reaction times for standard-incongruent items only, indicating that SLC reduced the response conflict that these (but not color-associated and neutral) items involve. N-inc amplitudes were more negative for standard-incongruent and color-associated than for color-neutral items. Importantly, this difference was not modulated by SLC. Hence, the behavioral and ERP results conjointly suggest that the Stroop-related N-inc is sensitive to semantic rather than to response and/or general conflict.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 549
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Priming and Backward Influences in the Human Brain: Processing Interactions during the Stroop Interference Effect [J].
Appelbaum, L. G. ;
Meyerhoff, K. L. ;
Woldorff, M. G. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2009, 19 (11) :2508-2521
[2]  
Augustinova M., 2014, CURRENT DIRECTIONS P
[3]  
Augustinova M, 2007, ANN PSYCHOL, V107, P163
[4]   Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: What component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced? [J].
Augustinova, Maria ;
Ferrand, Ludovic .
COGNITION, 2014, 130 (03) :442-454
[5]   Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect [J].
Augustinova, Maria ;
Flaudias, Valentin ;
Ferrand, Ludovic .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2010, 17 (06) :827-833
[6]   The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity [J].
Besner, D ;
Stolz, JA ;
Boutilier, C .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1997, 4 (02) :221-225
[7]   The Relationship Between Stroop Interference and Facilitation Effects: Statistical Artifacts, Baselines, and a Reassessment [J].
Brown, Tracy L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2011, 37 (01) :85-99
[8]   Electrophysiological measures of conflict detection and resolution in the Stroop task [J].
Coderre, Emily ;
Conklin, Kathy ;
van Heuven, Walter J. B. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2011, 1413 :51-59
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
[10]   Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference [J].
Ferrand, Ludovic ;
Augustinova, Maria .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2014, 21 (02) :425-431