A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations

被引:36
|
作者
Schabel, Matthias C. [1 ]
Fluckiger, Jacob U. [1 ]
DiBella, Edward V. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, Utah Ctr Adv Imaging Res, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
关键词
REFERENCE TISSUE METHOD; REFERENCE REGION MODEL; KINETIC-PARAMETERS; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; PERFUSION MRI; DCE-MRI; GRADIENT-ECHO; VASCULAR-PERMEABILITY; BLOOD-VOLUME; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/011
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Widespread adoption of quantitative pharmacokinetic modeling methods in conjunction with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has led to increased recognition of the importance of obtaining accurate patient-specific arterial input function (AIF) measurements. Ideally, DCE-MRI studies use an AIF directly measured in an artery local to the tissue of interest, along with measured tissue concentration curves, to quantitatively determine pharmacokinetic parameters. However, the numerous technical and practical difficulties associated with AIF measurement have made the use of population-averaged AIF data a popular, if sub-optimal, alternative to AIF measurement. In this work, we present and characterize a new algorithm for determining the AIF solely from the measured tissue concentration curves. This Monte Carlo blind estimation (MCBE) algorithm estimates the AIF from the subsets of D concentration-time curves drawn from a larger pool of M candidate curves via nonlinear optimization, doing so for multiple (Q) subsets and statistically averaging these repeated estimates. The MCBE algorithm can be viewed as a generalization of previously published methods that employ clustering of concentration-time curves and only estimate the AIF once. Extensive computer simulations were performed over physiologically and experimentally realistic ranges of imaging and tissue parameters, and the impact of choosing different values of D and Q was investigated. We found the algorithm to be robust, computationally efficient and capable of accurately estimating the AIF even for relatively high noise levels, long sampling intervals and low diversity of tissue curves. With the incorporation of bootstrapping initialization, we further demonstrated the ability to blindly estimate AIFs that deviate substantially in shape from the population-averaged initial guess. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates for K-trans, k(ep), v(p) and v(e) all showed relative biases and uncertainties of less than 10% for measurements having a temporal sampling rate of 4 s and a concentration measurement noise level of sigma = 0.04 mM. A companion paper discusses the application of the MCBE algorithm to DCE-MRI data acquired in eight patients with malignant brain tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:4783 / 4806
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The arterial input function: Spatial dependence within the imaging volume and its influence on 3D quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for head and neck cancer
    Roberts, John
    Kim, Seong-Eun
    Kholmovski, Eugene G.
    Hitchcock, Ying
    Richards, Tyler John
    Anzai, Yoshimi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 101 : 40 - 46
  • [42] Optimization of saturation-recovery dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition protocol: monte carlo simulation approach demonstrated with gadolinium MR renography
    Zhang, Jeff L.
    Conlin, Chris C.
    Carlston, Kristi
    Xie, Luke
    Kim, Daniel
    Morrell, Glen
    Morton, Kathryn
    Lee, Vivian S.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2016, 29 (07) : 969 - 977
  • [43] Determination of arterial input function using fuzzy clustering for quantification of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Murase, K
    Kikuchi, K
    Miki, H
    Shimizu, T
    Ikezoe, J
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (05) : 797 - 806
  • [44] Quantitative Contrast-Enhanced First-Pass Cardiac Perfusion MRI at 3 Tesla With Accurate Arterial Input Function and Myocardial Wall Enhancement
    Breton, Elodie
    Kim, Daniel
    Chung, Sohae
    Axel, Leon
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 34 (03) : 676 - 684
  • [45] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Neuroendocrine Hepatic Metastases: A Feasibility Study Using a Dual-Input Two-Compartment Model
    Koh, T. S.
    Thng, C. H.
    Hartono, S.
    Kwek, J. W.
    Khoo, J. B. K.
    Miyazaki, K.
    Collins, D. J.
    Orton, M. R.
    Leach, M. O.
    Lewington, V.
    Koh, D. -M.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2011, 65 (01) : 250 - 260
  • [46] Comparison of different population-averaged arterial-input-functions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: Effects on pharmacokinetic parameters and their diagnostic performance
    Othman, Ahmed E.
    Falkner, Florian
    Kessler, David-Emanuel
    Martirosian, Petros
    Weiss, Jakob
    Kruck, Stephan
    Kaufmann, Sascha
    Grimm, Robert
    Kramer, Ulrich
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Notohamiprodjo, Mike
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 34 (04) : 496 - 501
  • [47] Mathematical model for histogram analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: A method to evaluate the drug treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis
    Mori, Yu
    Mori, Naoko
    Izumiyama, Takuya
    Inoue, Asami
    Takase, Kei
    Aizawa, Toshimi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 141
  • [48] Myocardial Blood Flow at Rest and Stress Measured with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Comparison of a Distributed Parameter Model with a Fermi Function Model
    Broadbent, David A.
    Biglands, John D.
    Larghat, Abdulghani
    Sourbron, Steven P.
    Radjenovic, Aleksandra
    Greenwood, John P.
    Plein, Sven
    Buckley, David L.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2013, 70 (06) : 1591 - 1597
  • [49] The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge, Part II
    Huang, Wei
    Chen, Yiyi
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Li, Xia
    Jajamovich, Guido H.
    Malyarenko, Dariya, I
    Aryal, Madhava P.
    LaViolette, Peter S.
    Oborski, Matthew J.
    O'Sullivan, Finbarr
    Abramson, Richard G.
    Jafari-Khouzani, Kourosh
    Afzal, Aneela
    Tudorica, Alina
    Moloney, Brendan
    Gupta, Sandeep N.
    Besa, Cecilia
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Mountz, James M.
    Laymon, Charles M.
    Muzi, Mark
    Kinahan, Paul E.
    Schmainda, Kathleen
    Cao, Yue
    Chenevert, Thomas L.
    Taouli, Bachir
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    Fennessy, Fiona
    Li, Xin
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 5 (01) : 99 - 109
  • [50] Arterial input functions in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: which model performs best when assessing breast cancer response?
    Woolf, David K.
    Taylor, N. Jane
    Makris, Andreas
    Tunariu, Nina
    Collins, David J.
    Li, Sonia P.
    Ah-See, Mei-Lin
    Beresford, Mark
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1063)