Implicit finite-difference simulations of seismic wave propagation

被引:6
作者
Chu, Chunlei [1 ]
Stoffa, Paul L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Conoco Phillips, Houston, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Inst Geophys, Austin, TX USA
关键词
SCHEMES; ORDER;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2011-0180.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We propose a new finite-difference modeling method, implicit both in space and in time, for the scalar wave equation. We use a three-level implicit splitting time integration method for the temporal derivative and implicit finite-difference operators of arbitrary order for the spatial derivatives. Both the implicit splitting time integration method and the implicit spatial finite-difference operators require solving systems of linear equations. We show that it is possible to merge these two sets of linear systems, one from implicit temporal discretizations and the other from implicit spatial discretizations, to reduce the amount of computations to develop a highly efficient and accurate seismic modeling algorithm. We give the complete derivations of the implicit splitting time integration method and the implicit spatial finite-difference operators, and present the resulting discretized formulas for the scalar wave equation. We conduct a thorough numerical analysis on grid dispersions of this new implicit modeling method. We show that implicit spatial finite-difference operators greatly improve the accuracy of the implicit splitting time integration simulation results with only a slight increase in computational time, compared with explicit spatial finite-difference operators. We further verify this conclusion by both 2D and 3D numerical examples.
引用
收藏
页码:T57 / T67
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS OF THE CHOICE OF OPERATOR AND SAMPLING INTERVAL FOR NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN LARGE-SCALE SIMULATION OF WAVE PHENOMENA [J].
HOLBERG, O .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1987, 35 (06) :629-655
[12]   ANISOTROPIC WAVE-PROPAGATION THROUGH FINITE-DIFFERENCE GRIDS [J].
IGEL, H ;
MORA, P ;
RIOLLET, B .
GEOPHYSICS, 1995, 60 (04) :1203-1216
[13]   High-order schemes for acoustic waveform simulation [J].
Kim, Seongjai ;
Lim, Hyeona .
APPLIED NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 2007, 57 (04) :402-414
[14]   Acoustic and elastic numerical wave simulations by recursive spatial derivative operators [J].
Kosloff, Dan ;
Pestana, Reynam C. ;
Tal-Ezer, Hillel .
GEOPHYSICS, 2010, 75 (06) :T167-T174
[15]   COMPACT FINITE-DIFFERENCE SCHEMES WITH SPECTRAL-LIKE RESOLUTION [J].
LELE, SK .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1992, 103 (01) :16-42
[16]   A practical implicit finite-difference method: examples from seismic modelling [J].
Liu, Yang ;
Sen, Mrinal K. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2009, 6 (03) :231-249
[17]   3D fourth-order staggered-grid finite-difference schemes: Stability and grid dispersion [J].
Moczo, P ;
Kristek, J ;
Halada, L .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 90 (03) :587-603
[18]   SEISMIC MODELING IN THE IMPLICIT MODE [J].
MUFTI, IR .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1985, 33 (05) :619-656
[19]   High-order compact-difference schemes for time-dependent Maxwell equations [J].
Shang, JS .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1999, 153 (02) :312-333
[20]  
Soubaras R., 2008, 78th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, P2272