The reliability and validity of inventory-18 in persons with the brief symptom traumatic brain injury

被引:101
作者
Meachen, Sarah-Jane [1 ,2 ]
Hanks, Robin A. [1 ,3 ]
Millis, Scott R. [1 ,3 ]
Rapport, Lisa J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rehabil Inst Michigan, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Psychol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2008年 / 89卷 / 05期
关键词
brain injuries; rehabilitation; reliability and validity;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.028
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) among persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Inception cohort design with cross-sectional follow-up of 6 months to 15 years. Setting: Rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Adults (N=257) with moderate to severe TBI (81 inpatients and 176 follow-up participants, analyzed separately). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The BSI-18 is a brief screen of psychologic distress with a Global Severity Index (GSI), and 3 clinical subscales: somatization. anxiety, and depression. Results: Internal consistency of the GSI was high in both follow-up participants (alpha = .91) and inpatients (alpha = .84), whereas estimates for the somatization, anxiety, and depression subscales were more variable (alpha range, .61-.84). As Would be expected for a measure of affective state, retest reliability estimates were only moderate. The BSI-18 GSI correlated with multiple measures of psychosocial adjustment. After accounting for demographics, injury severity, inpatient functional status, years Since injury, and various psychosocial factors. the BSI-18 showed incremental validity in predicting concurrent functional, psychosocial, and psychologic status. Conclusions: The BSI-18 GSI had excellent reliability and validity among inpatients and follow-up participants. Modest reliability estimates may place an upper bound on the validity of the BSI-18 clinical subscales in inpatient TBI populations.
引用
收藏
页码:958 / 965
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Allison PD., 2001, MISSING DATA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Advances in Medical Psychotherapy
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory: NFI
[4]   Psychiatric challenges in the first 6 years after traumatic brain injury: Cross-sequential analyses of axis I disorders [J].
Ashman, TA ;
Spielman, LA ;
Hibbard, MR ;
Silver, JM ;
Chandna, T ;
Gordon, WA .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (04) :S36-S42
[5]  
Asner-Self Kimberly K, 2006, Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol, V12, P367, DOI 10.1037/1099-9809.12.2.367
[6]   Diagnosing depression in persons with brain injuries: a look at theories, the DSM-IV and depression measures [J].
Babin, PR .
BRAIN INJURY, 2003, 17 (10) :889-900
[7]   WHAT IS COEFFICIENT ALPHA - AN EXAMINATION OF THEORY AND APPLICATIONS [J].
CORTINA, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :98-104
[8]  
Cutrona C.E., 1987, Advances in personal relationships, V1, P37
[9]  
Dahmer ER., 1993, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V8, P12, DOI [10.1097/00001199-199308020-00004, DOI 10.1097/00001199-199308020-00004]
[10]   Return to productivity following traumatic brain injury: Cognitive, psychological, physical, spiritual, and environmental correlates [J].
Dawson, Deirdre R. ;
Schwartz, Michael L. ;
Winocur, Gordon ;
Stuss, Donald T. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2007, 29 (04) :301-313