Anal sphincter reconstruction by dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal resection for cancer

被引:33
|
作者
Rouanet, P [2 ]
Senesse, P
Bouamrirene, D
Toureille, E
Veyrac, M
Astre, C
Bacou, F
机构
[1] Ctr Val Aurelle, Inst Gastrointestinal Dis, F-34298 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Ctr Val Aurelle, Montpellier Canc Inst, INRA, F-34298 Montpellier, France
关键词
abdominoperineal resection; cancer; sphincter reconstruction; dynamic graciloplasty; functional outcome; quality of life;
D O I
10.1007/BF02234165
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Chronic low-frequency electrical stimulation can safely transform fatiguing muscle into fatigue-resistant muscle. This fundamental discovery was used to reconstruct the anal sphincter. Dynamic graciloplasty was found to be effective in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Our study was undertaken to investigate the oncologic, functional, and quality of life results of dynamic graciloplasty anal reconstruction after an abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma. METHODS: Between April 1993 and April 1996, nine patients (4 males) with a median age of 51.2 (range, 29-69) years underwent an abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma (4 had a rectal adenocarcinoma and 5 had an epidermoidal anal tumor) and an anal sphincter reconstruction with electrically stimulated graciloplasty. Oncologic and functional results were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 32 (range, 14-50) months. A quality of life questionnaire was filled out by seven patients. RESULTS: Sphincter reconstruction required the same hospitalization period as abdominoperineal resection. Two patients died from evolutive disease. Three patients were operated on twice, one for immediate colonic necrosis, two for colonic perforation after enema. One of them refused the graciloplasty and had an abdominoperineal resection. Six patients were dysfunctioned. The mean resting pressure was 24 +/- 10 mmHg, and the mean pressure during stimulation was 95 +/- 25 mmHg. Five patients were continent for solids and liquid; four wore less than three pads per day, and one wore more than three. Four patients used enemas twice a week; one patient had spontaneous evacuation. The quality of life questionnaire showed that the mean scores for social interaction, symptoms, and psychological and physical states were 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, and 2.7, respectively. The mean value was 1.5. CONCLUSIONS: Total anorectal reconstruction with dynamic graciloplasty is an oncologically safe procedure. Functional results improve with time, but careful patient selection guarantees a successful functional outcome. Technical progress is necessary to improve the quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 456
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pelvic reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum
    Moreno-Sanz, Carlos
    Manzanera-Diaz, Marina
    Clerveus, Mikael
    Javier Cortina-Oliva, F.
    de Pedro-Conal, Julian
    Picazo-Yeste, Joaquin
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2011, 89 (02): : 77 - 81
  • [22] Abdominoperineal resection in anal cancer: Reconstruction of the perineum with a myocutaneous flap from the anterior rectus abdominis muscle
    Casal Nunez, Jose Enrique
    Caceres Alvarado, Nieves
    de Sanildefonso Pereira, Alberto
    Toscano Novelle, M. Angeles
    Garcia Martinez, M. Teresa
    Jove Albores, Patricia
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2011, 89 (01): : 31 - 36
  • [23] A systematic review of outcomes after salvage abdominoperineal resection for persistent or recurrent anal squamous cell cancer
    Ko, G.
    Sarkaria, A.
    Merchant, S. J.
    Booth, C. M.
    Patel, S. V.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 21 (06) : 632 - 650
  • [24] Quality of Life after Rectal Cancer Resection Comparing Anterior Resection, Abdominoperineal Resection, and Complicated Cases
    Scheele, Jan
    Lemke, Johannes
    Wittau, Mathias
    Sander, Silvia
    Henne-Bruns, Doris
    Kornmann, Marko
    VISCERAL MEDICINE, 2022, 38 (02) : 138 - 149
  • [25] One-stage dynamic graciloplasty for anal incontinence
    Sans, A.
    Mege, D.
    Sielezneff, I.
    JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2017, 154 (06) : 437 - 448
  • [26] Surgical Outcomes after Abdominoperineal Resection with Sacrectomy and Soft Tissue Reconstruction: Lessons Learned
    Manrique, Oscar J.
    Rajesh, Aashish
    Asaad, Malke
    Bakri, Karim
    Tran, Nho, V
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    Dozois, Eric J.
    Rose, Peter S.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2020, 36 (01) : 64 - 71
  • [27] Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection
    Puerta Diaz, J. D.
    Castao Llano, R.
    Lombana, L. J.
    Restrepo, J. I.
    Gomez, G.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2013, 17 (04) : 425 - 429
  • [28] Robotic Rectus Abdominis Harvest for Pelvic Reconstruction after Abdominoperineal Resection
    Appel, Richard
    Shih, Linden
    Gimenez, Alejandro
    Bay, Caroline
    Chai, Christy Yoon-Hee
    Maricevich, Marco
    SEMINARS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 37 (03) : 188 - 192
  • [29] Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection
    J. D. Puerta Díaz
    R. Castaño Llano
    L. J. Lombana
    J. I. Restrepo
    G. Gómez
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2013, 17 : 425 - 429
  • [30] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for anal cancer: feasibility and technical considerations
    Patel, Chirag B.
    Ramos-Valadez, Diego I.
    Haas, Eric M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2010, 6 (04) : 399 - 404