Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods

被引:285
作者
van Doorn, Jenny [1 ]
Verhoef, Peter C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Mkt, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Sustainability; Retailing; Consumer behavior; Pricing; Environmentalism; ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; ECO-LABELS; CHOICE; INFORMATION; BEHAVIOR; DETERMINANTS; CONSUMPTION; FREQUENCY; SEAFOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.02.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Faced with growing environmental problems, food safety issues, and increasing obesity rates, many consumers desire healthier, less processed natural foods that are less harmful to the environment. Yet organic foods only partially benefit from this market environment, and their market share remains quite low despite high growth rates. The usual explanation for this discrepancy is that consumers are not willing to pay the price premium prompted by an organic claim. In this paper, we explore the reasons behind consumers' (un) willingness to pay for organic food and investigate whether it differs between virtue and vice food categories. The results indicate that in vice food categories, organic claims are associated with lower quality, which seems to be only partly compensated by higher prosocial benefits. The lower-quality perceptions translate into a decreased consumer willingness to pay (WTP). We supplement the empirical results with data on organic purchases ill the Dutch food market. These data show that market shares of organic food are indeed lower for vice categories of organic food. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 180
页数:14
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: Store brands versus national brand promotions
    Ailawadi, KL
    Neslin, SA
    Gedenk, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2001, 65 (01) : 71 - 89
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, MarketWatch: Food, V3, P10
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, V34, P477, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1074070800009251
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, Econometric Analysis, DOI DOI 10.1093/GERONB/GBQ006
  • [5] Do social product features have value to consumers?
    Auger, Pat
    Devinney, Timothy M.
    Louviere, Jordan J.
    Burke, Paul F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2008, 25 (03) : 183 - 191
  • [6] MEASURING UTILITY BY A SINGLE-RESPONSE SEQUENTIAL METHOD
    BECKER, GM
    DEGROOT, MH
    MARSCHAK, J
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1964, 9 (03): : 226 - 232
  • [7] Bezawada R., 2010, ARE ORGANICS SPECIAL
  • [8] Doing better at dong good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives
    Bhattacharya, CB
    Sen, S
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2004, 47 (01) : 9 - +
  • [9] Biomonitor, 2009, BIOM JAARR 2009
  • [10] Measuring consumer demand for ecolabeled apples
    Blend, JR
    van Ravenswaay, EO
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 81 (05) : 1072 - 1077