Embracing Complexity and Uncertainty

被引:19
作者
Winkler, Julie A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Geog, Geog, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
adaptation; assessments; climate change; complexity; decision making; uncertainty; CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACT; DECISION-MAKING; CO-BENEFITS; SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; ADAPTATION; VULNERABILITY; COMMUNICATION; SCIENCE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/24694452.2016.1207973
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Geographers can meaningfully and uniquely contribute to problem solving and assist vulnerable populations in making informed decisions. Contemporary environmental and social problems are complex and accompanied by uncertainty. Decisions must be made in the face of this uncertainty. In this address, geographers are encouraged to embrace, rather than minimize, complexity and uncertainty in their research and in their interactions with decision makers. Adaptation to climate change is used to illustrate the ubiquitous uncertainty surrounding problem solving and how the choice of assessment framework can overemphasize some sources of uncertainty and ignore others. A challenge is to communicate the information about complexity and uncertainty that decision makers need for robust and flexible decision making but at the same time prevent uncertainty from being equated with a lack of consensus and used as a reason for inaction. Geographers need to be open to a plurality of approaches to decision making and acknowledge uncertainty in their own research. Reframing the communication of uncertainty and the development of novel educational tools and learning materials for decision makers will facilitate decision making. Sustained engagement with decision makers, including the coproduction of knowledge, can also lead to greater consideration of complexity and uncertainty and to improved decision making. Rather than "keeping it simple," geographers should "keep it complex."
引用
收藏
页码:1418 / 1433
页数:16
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [1] Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001]
  • [2] Africa Development Bank, 2013, METH TRACK CLIM AD M
  • [3] Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective
    Andersson, Krister P.
    Ostrom, Elinor
    [J]. POLICY SCIENCES, 2008, 41 (01) : 71 - 93
  • [4] [Anonymous], INT ENV STRAT HDB RE
  • [5] Asseng S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P827, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1916, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1916]
  • [6] Barnett J., 2013, Climate Adaptation Futures, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118529577.CH7
  • [7] Maladaptation
    Barnett, Jon
    O'Neill, Saffron
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2010, 20 (02): : 211 - 213
  • [8] Barsugli J.J., 2013, Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, V94, P424, DOI DOI 10.1002/2013EO460005
  • [9] Deja vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature
    Bassett, Thomas J.
    Fogelman, Charles
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2013, 48 : 42 - 53
  • [10] A comprehensive review of climate adaptation in the United States: more than before, but less than needed
    Bierbaum, Rosina
    Smith, Joel B.
    Lee, Arthur
    Blair, Maria
    Carter, Lynne
    Chapin, F. Stuart, III
    Fleming, Paul
    Ruffo, Susan
    Stults, Missy
    McNeeley, Shannon
    Wasley, Emily
    Verduzco, Laura
    [J]. MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2013, 18 (03) : 361 - 406