The methodological quality of systematic reviews indexed in the MEDLINE database A multivariate approach

被引:3
作者
Martin-Rodero, Helena [1 ]
Sanz-Valero, Javier [2 ]
Galindo-Villardon, Purificacion [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, Med Sch Lib, Salamanca, Spain
[2] Miguel Hernandez Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Hist Sci, Alicante, Spain
[3] Univ Salamanca, Dept Stat, Salamanca, Spain
关键词
Information retrieval; Systematic reviews; Literature search protocols; Logistic biplots; MEDLINE/PubMed; Multivariate statistical techniques; MEDICAL SUBJECT-HEADINGS; SEARCH STRATEGIES; TEXT-WORD;
D O I
10.1108/EL-01-2017-0002
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe and analyse the methodology quality of the literature search protocols of systematic reviews and to assess the relevance of the search filter that applies PubMed for retrieving this type of publication of the MEDLINE database. Design/methodology/approach - For the selection of the document type, a literature search about nutritional and metabolic diseases was carried out in MEDLINE and the PubMed filter was used for retrieving "Systematic Reviews", selecting "Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases" from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) database as Major Topic to determine the area of knowledge. Data analysis was carried out using "External Logistic Biplot", a novel multivariate statistical technique in the field of medical documentation. Findings - The results highlight the large variability of the methodology used in the literature search protocols of the systematic reviews analysed and confirm the low precision of the filter used by PubMed for the recovery of systematic reviews. Originality/value - The Logistic Biplot used in this research allows an optimal categorization of the different documentary typologies and classifies the documents by their methodological quality, demonstrating its usefulness for the future development of the bibliometric analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 158
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]  
Orive JIDG, 2005, ARCH BRONCONEUMOL, V41, P78
[22]   A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension [J].
Rathbone J. ;
Carter M. ;
Hoffmann T. ;
Glasziou P. .
Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
[23]   No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews [J].
Sampson, Margaret ;
McGowan, Jessie ;
Tetzlaff, Jennifer ;
Cogo, Elise ;
Moher, David .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (08) :748-754
[24]   Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency [J].
Sampson, Margaret ;
McGowan, Jessie .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (10) :1057-1063
[25]   BIBLIOMETRIC AND THEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE ABOUT OMEGA-3 FATTY ACIDS INDEXED IN INTERNATIONAL DATABASES ON HEALTH SCIENCES [J].
Sanz-Valero, J. ;
Gil, A. ;
Wanden-Berghe, C. ;
Martinez de Victoria, E. .
NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2012, 27 :41-48
[26]  
Sanz-Valero J, 2011, SALUD COLECT, V7, P61
[27]  
Schlosser R., 2007, Focus, V17, P1
[28]   From QUOROM to PRISMA: A Survey of High-Impact Medical Journals' Instructions to Authors and a Review of Systematic Reviews in Anesthesia Literature [J].
Tao, Kun-ming ;
Li, Xiao-qian ;
Zhou, Qing-hui ;
Moher, David ;
Ling, Chang-quan ;
Yu, Wei-feng .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11)
[29]  
Tomás-Casterá Vicente, 2009, An Venez Nutr, V22, P90
[30]   On the use of biplot analysis for multivariate bibliometric and scientific indicators [J].
Torres-Salinas, Daniel ;
Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas ;
Jimenez-Contreras, Evaristo ;
Herrera, Francisco ;
Delgado Lopez-Cozar, Emilio .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (07) :1468-1479