Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige

被引:240
作者
von Rueden, Christopher [1 ]
Gurven, Michael [1 ]
Kaplan, Hillard [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Anthropol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Anthropol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
social status; fertility; behavioural ecology; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; ACHE FORAGERS; EVOLUTION; HUNTERS; SELECTION; BENEFITS; WEALTH; WOMEN; LIFE; SEX;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2010.2145
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In many human societies, high male social status associates with higher fertility, but the means by which status increases lifetime fitness have not been systematically investigated. We analyse the pathways by which male status begets reproductive success in a small-scale, Amerindian society. Men who are more likely to win a dyadic physical confrontation, i.e. dominant men, have higher intra-marital fertility for their age, and men with more community-wide influence, i.e. prestigious men, exhibit both higher intra-marital fertility and lower offspring mortality. Both forms of status elicit support from allies and deference from competitors, but high status men are not provisioned more than their peers. Prestigious but not dominant men marry wives who first give birth at earlier ages, which multivariate analysis suggests is the strongest pathway between status and fitness in this population. Furthermore, men are motivated to pursue status because of fitness gains both within and outside of marital unions: dominant and prestigious men have more in-pair surviving offspring as well as more extra-marital affairs.
引用
收藏
页码:2223 / 2232
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   Why do some women prefer submissive men? Hierarchically disparate couples reach higher reproductive success in European urban humans [J].
Jozifkova, Eva ;
Konvicka, Martin ;
Flegr, Jaroslav .
NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 35 (07) :594-601
[32]   When and Why Do Men Negotiate Assertively? It Depends on Specific Threats to Their Masculinity and the Negotiation Topic [J].
Mazei, Jens ;
Bear, Julia B. ;
Hueffmeier, Joachim .
PSYCHOLOGY OF MEN & MASCULINITIES, 2023, 24 (02) :137-148
[33]   Two Routes to Status, One Route to Health: Trait Dominance and Prestige Differentially Associate with Self-reported Stress and Health in Two US University Populations [J].
Knight, Erik L. .
ADAPTIVE HUMAN BEHAVIOR AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 8 (04) :461-488
[34]   Modeling Nonprofit Employment: Why Do So Many Lesbians and Gay Men Work for Nonprofit Organizations? [J].
Lewis, Gregory B. .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2010, 42 (06) :720-748
[35]   Why do new members stop attending health and fitness venues? The importance of developing frequent and stable attendance behaviour [J].
Rand, Matthew ;
Goyder, Elizabeth ;
Norman, Paul ;
Womack, Robert .
PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2020, 51
[36]   Why do women of low socioeconomic status have poorer dietary behaviours than women of higher socioeconomic status? A qualitative exploration [J].
Inglis, V ;
Ball, K ;
Crawford, D .
APPETITE, 2005, 45 (03) :334-343
[37]   "Why do women have less opportunity for entrepreneurial success compared to men?" (Case study: Indonesian entrepreneurship) [J].
Muis, Ismarli ;
Suleeman, Julia ;
Riyanti, Benedicta Prihatin Dwi .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY (ICEST 2017), 2017, 149 :49-51
[38]   Reasons why women with long-term urinary incontinence do not seek professional help:: a cross-sectional population-based cohort study [J].
Hägglund, D ;
Walker-Engström, ML ;
Larsson, G ;
Leppert, J .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2003, 14 (05) :296-304
[39]   Reasons why women with long-term urinary incontinence do not seek professional help: a cross-sectional population-based cohort study [J].
Doris Hägglund ;
Marie-Louise Walker-Engström ;
Gregor Larsson ;
Jerzy Leppert .
International Urogynecology Journal, 2003, 14 :296-304
[40]   Why do women interact with their parents more often than men? The demonstration effect vs. the biological effect [J].
Tao, Hung-Lin .
SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2014, 51 (03) :350-360