A Mating Selection Based on Modified Strengthened Dominance Relation for NSGA-III

被引:4
作者
Dutta, Saykat [1 ]
Raju, Sri Srinivasa M. [1 ]
Mallipeddi, Rammohan [2 ]
Das, Kedar Nath [1 ]
Lee, Dong-Gyu [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Silchar, Dept Math, Silchar 788010, Assam, India
[2] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Dept Artificial Intelligence, Daegu 41566, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
convergence; decomposition; diversity; dominance; ensemble; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; DECOMPOSITION; CONVERGENCE; OPTIMALITY; DIVERSITY; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/math9222837
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
In multi/many-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs), to alleviate the degraded convergence pressure of Pareto dominance with the increase in the number of objectives, numerous modified dominance relationships were proposed. Recently, the strengthened dominance relation (SDR) has been proposed, where the dominance area of a solution is determined by convergence degree and niche size (theta over bar ). Later, in controlled SDR (CSDR), theta over bar and an additional parameter (k) associated with the convergence degree are dynamically adjusted depending on the iteration count. Depending on the problem characteristics and the distribution of the current population, different situations require different values of k, rendering the linear reduction of k based on the generation count ineffective. This is because a particular value of k is expected to bias the dominance relationship towards a particular region on the Pareto front (PF). In addition, due to the same reason, using SDR or CSDR in the environmental selection cannot preserve the diversity of solutions required to cover the entire PF. Therefore, we propose an MOEA, referred to as NSGA-III*, where (1) a modified SDR (MSDR)-based mating selection with an adaptive ensemble of parameter k would prioritize parents from specific sections of the PF depending on k, and (2) the traditional weight vector and non-dominated sorting-based environmental selection of NSGA-III would protect the solutions corresponding to the entire PF. The performance of NSGA-III* is favourably compared with state-of-the-art MOEAs on DTLZ and WFG test suites with up to 10 objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   HypE: An Algorithm for Fast Hypervolume-Based Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Bader, Johannes ;
Zitzler, Eckart .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 19 (01) :45-76
[2]  
Batista LS, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6576, P76, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19893-9_6
[3]   A Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Cheng, Ran ;
Jin, Yaochu ;
Olhofer, Markus ;
Sendhoff, Bernhard .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2016, 20 (05) :773-791
[4]   Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1998, 8 (03) :631-657
[5]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[6]   An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point-Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part I: Solving Problems With Box Constraints [J].
Deb, Kalyanmoy ;
Jain, Himanshu .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2014, 18 (04) :577-601
[7]   A New Decomposition-Based NSGA-II for Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Elarbi, Maha ;
Bechikh, Slim ;
Gupta, Abhishek ;
Ben Said, Lamjed ;
Ong, Yew-Soon .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2018, 48 (07) :1191-1210
[8]   A fuzzy definition of "optimality" for many-criteria optimization problems [J].
Farina, M ;
Amato, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2004, 34 (03) :315-326
[9]  
Golberg D.E., 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHMS S, V102, P36
[10]   Fuzzy-Based Pareto Optimality for Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms [J].
He, Zhenan ;
Yen, Gary G. ;
Zhang, Jun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2014, 18 (02) :269-285