The views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: a qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making

被引:30
作者
Selman, Lucy Ellen [1 ]
Bristowe, Katherine [2 ]
Higginson, Irene J. [2 ]
Murtagh, Fliss E. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Populat Hlth Sci, Canynge Hall,39 Whatley Rd, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Cicely Saunders Inst Palliat Care Policy & Rehab, London, England
[3] Univ Hull, Hull York Med Sch, Wolfson Palliat Care Res Ctr, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
关键词
Qualitative research; Kidney disease; Chronic; Professional-patient relations; Communication; Education; Conservative treatment; Palliative care; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; OF-LIFE CARE; REPLACEMENT THERAPY; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; SUPPORTIVE CARE; DIALYSIS PATIENTS; END; PATIENT; SURVIVAL; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1186/s12882-019-1230-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundOlder people with advanced kidney disease require information and support from clinicians when deciding whether to have dialysis or conservative (non-dialysis) care. There is evidence that communication practices, information provision and treatment rates vary widely across renal units. However, experiences of communicating with clinicians among patients receiving conservative care are poorly understood. This evidence is essential to ensure support is patient-centred and equitable. Our aim was to explore views and experiences of communication, information provision and treatment decision-making among older patients receiving conservative care.MethodsIn-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease from three UK renal units. Purposive sampling captured variation in age, co-morbidity and functional status. Interviews were analysed thematically.Results20 patients were interviewed (11 were men; median age 82 (range 69-95)). Participants described positive experiences of communicating with clinicians and receiving information, but also negative experiences involving insensitivity, rushing or ambiguity. Participants reported clinicians omitting/avoiding conversations regarding diagnosis and prognosis, and described what helped and hindered good communication and support. They wanted information about their treatment options and illness, but expressed ambivalence about knowing details of disease progression. Clinicians' views and recommendations regarding treatment influenced patients' decision-making.ConclusionsOlder patients report variable quality in communication with clinicians and gaps in the information received. Uncertainty about the disease trajectory and patients' ambivalence regarding information makes communication particularly challenging for clinicians. Tailoring information to patient preferences and conveying it clearly and sensitively is critical. Renal clinicians require support and training to ensure decision-making support for older patients is patient-centred. Future research should examine how clinicians' communication practices influence treatment decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software
[2]   Renal dialysis abatement: lessons from a social study [J].
Ashby, M ;
Hoog, CO ;
Kellehear, A ;
Kerr, PG ;
Brooks, D ;
Nicholls, K ;
Forrest, M .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 19 (05) :389-396
[3]   Nurse-Perceived Barriers to Effective Communication Regarding Prognosis and Optimal End-of-Life Care for Surgical ICU Patients: A Qualitative Exploration [J].
Aslakson, Rebecca A. ;
Wyskiel, Rhonda ;
Thornton, Imani ;
Copley, Christina ;
Shaffer, Dauryne ;
Zyra, Marylou ;
Nelson, Judith ;
Pronovost, Peter J. .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 15 (08) :910-915
[4]  
Berkhout-Byrne N, 2017, NETH J MED, V75, P225
[5]  
Bristowe K, 2019, ANN PALLIATIVE MED
[6]   Patient and carer experiences of clinical uncertainty and deterioration, in the face of limited reversibility: A comparative observational study of the AMBER care bundle [J].
Bristowe, Katherine ;
Carey, Irene ;
Hopper, Adrian ;
Shouls, Susanna ;
Prentice, Wendy ;
Caulkin, Ruth ;
Higginson, Irene J. ;
Koffman, Jonathan .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 29 (09) :797-807
[7]   Qualitative research methods in renal medicine: an introduction [J].
Bristowe, Katherine ;
Selman, Lucy ;
Murtagh, Fliss E. M. .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 30 (09) :1424-1431
[8]   The development and piloting of the REnal specific Advanced Communication Training (REACT) programme to improve Advance Care Planning for renal patients [J].
Bristowe, Katherine ;
Shepherd, Kate ;
Bryan, Liz ;
Brown, Heather ;
Carey, Irene ;
Matthews, Beverley ;
O'Donoghue, Donal ;
Vinen, Katie ;
Murtagh, Fliss E. M. .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (04) :360-366
[9]   VALIDATION OF A COMBINED COMORBIDITY INDEX [J].
CHARLSON, M ;
SZATROWSKI, TP ;
PETERSON, J ;
GOLD, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (11) :1245-1251
[10]   Quality of Life and Survival in Patients with Advanced Kidney Failure Managed Conservatively or by Dialysis [J].
Da Silva-Gane, Maria ;
Wellsted, David ;
Greenshields, Hannah ;
Norton, Sam ;
Chandna, Shahid M. ;
Farrington, Ken .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 7 (12) :2002-2009