Anomalies in the applied magnetic fields in DIII-D and their implications for the understanding of stability experiments

被引:73
作者
Luxon, JL
Schaffer, MJ
Jackson, GL
Leuer, JA
Nagy, A
Scoville, JT
Strait, EJ
机构
[1] Gen Atom Co, San Diego, CA 92186 USA
[2] Princeton Plasma Phys Lab, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0029-5515/43/12/024
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Small non-axisymmetric magnetic fields are known to cause serious loss of stability in tokamaks, leading to loss of confinement and abrupt termination of plasma current (disruptions). The best known examples are the locked mode and the resistive wall mode. Understanding of the underlying field anomalies (departures in the hardware-related fields from ideal toroidal and poloidal fields on a single axis) and the interaction of the plasma with them is crucial to tokamak development. Results of both locked mode experiments (Scoville J.T. and La Haye R.J. 2003 Nucl. Fusion 43 250) and resistive wall mode experiments (Garofalo A.M., La Haye R.J. and Scoville J.T. 2002 Nucl. Fusion 42 1335) done in DIII-D tokamak plasmas have been interpreted to indicate the presence of a significant anomalous field. New measurements of the magnetic field anomalies of the hardware systems have been made in DIII-D. The measured field anomalies due to the plasma shaping coils in DIII-D are smaller than previously reported (La Haye R.J. and Scoville J.T. 1991 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 612146). Additional evaluations of systematic errors have been made. New measurements of the anomalous fields of the Ohmic heating and toroidal coils have been added. Such detailed in situ measurements of the fields of a tokamak are unique. The anomalous fields from all the coils are one-third the values indicated from the stability experiments (Garofalo et al 2002, Scoville and La Haye 2003). These results indicate limitations in the understanding of the interaction of the plasma with the external field. They indicate that it may not be possible to deduce the anomalous fields in a tokamak from plasma experiments and that we may not have the basis needed to project the error field requirements of future tokamaks.
引用
收藏
页码:1813 / 1828
页数:16
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Error field amplification and rotation damping in tokamak plasmas
    Boozer, AH
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2001, 86 (22) : 5059 - 5061
  • [2] Error field mode studies on JET, COMPASS-D and DIII-D, and implications for ITER
    Buttery, RJ
    De' Benedetti, M
    Gates, DA
    Gribov, Y
    Hender, TC
    La Haye, RJ
    Leahy, P
    Leuer, JA
    Morris, AW
    Santagiustina, A
    Scoville, JT
    Tubbing, BJD
    [J]. NUCLEAR FUSION, 1999, 39 (11Y) : 1827 - 1835
  • [3] Error field experiments in JET
    Buttery, RJ
    De' Benedetti, M
    Hender, TC
    Tubbing, BJD
    [J]. NUCLEAR FUSION, 2000, 40 (04) : 807 - 819
  • [4] EVANS TE, 1991, P 18 EPS BERL C, V15, P65
  • [5] FIELD ERROR INSTABILITIES IN JET
    FISHPOOL, GM
    HAYNES, PS
    [J]. NUCLEAR FUSION, 1994, 34 (01) : 109 - 119
  • [6] INTERACTION OF TEARING MODES WITH EXTERNAL STRUCTURES IN CYLINDRICAL GEOMETRY
    FITZPATRICK, R
    [J]. NUCLEAR FUSION, 1993, 33 (07) : 1049 - 1084
  • [7] Analysis and correction of intrinsic non-axisymmetric magnetic fields in high-β DIII-D plasmas
    Garofalo, AM
    La Haye, RJ
    Scoville, JT
    [J]. NUCLEAR FUSION, 2002, 42 (11) : 1335 - 1339
  • [8] TOROIDAL CONTAINMENT OF A PLASMA
    GRAD, H
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1967, 10 (01) : 137 - &
  • [9] EFFECT OF RESONANT MAGNETIC PERTURBATIONS ON COMPASS-C TOKAMAK DISCHARGES
    HENDER, TC
    FITZPATRICK, R
    MORRIS, AW
    CAROLAN, PG
    DURST, RD
    EDLINGTON, T
    FERREIRA, J
    FIELDING, SJ
    HAYNES, PS
    HUGILL, J
    JENKINS, IJ
    LAHAYE, RJ
    PARHAM, BJ
    ROBINSON, DC
    TODD, TN
    VALOVIC, M
    VAYAKIS, G
    [J]. NUCLEAR FUSION, 1992, 32 (12) : 2091 - 2117
  • [10] A METHOD TO MEASURE MAGNETIC-FIELD PERTURBATIONS IN PLASMA-DEVICES
    JACKSON, GL
    DEGRASSIE, JS
    SCHAFFER, MJ
    TAYLOR, TS
    GENTLE, KW
    [J]. REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1989, 60 (09) : 2883 - 2887