Antidepressant Response in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Regression Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies

被引:50
作者
Naudet, Florian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Maria, Anne Solene [1 ,4 ]
Falissard, Bruno [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Inst Natl Sante & Rech Med, U669, Paris, France
[2] Univ Rennes 1, Unite Rech Univ Behav & Basal Ganglia EM 425, Rennes, France
[3] Univ Psychiatrie, Serv Hosp, Ctr Hosp Guillaume Regnier, Rennes, France
[4] Ecole Psychol Praticiens, Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris Sud, Paris, France
[6] Univ Paris 05, Unite Mixte Rech S0669, Paris, France
[7] Hop Paul Brousse, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Sante Publ, Villejuif, France
来源
PLOS ONE | 2011年 / 6卷 / 06期
关键词
PLACEBO-RESPONSE; EFFICACY TRIALS; PRIMARY-CARE; DOUBLE-BLIND; METAANALYSIS; COEFFICIENTS; SEVERITY; BENEFITS; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0020811
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: To compare response to antidepressants between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational trials. Methods and Findings: Published and unpublished studies (from 1989 to 2009) were searched for by 2 reviewers on Medline, the Cochrane library, Embase, clinicaltrials. gov, Current Controlled Trial, bibliographies and by mailing key organisations and researchers. RCTs and observational studies on fluoxetine or venlafaxine in first-line treatment for major depressive disorder reported in English, French or Spanish language were included in the main analysis. Studies including patients from a wider spectrum of depressive disorders (anxious depression, minor depressive episode, dysthymia) were added in a second analysis. The main outcome was the pre-/post-treatment difference on depression scales standardised to 100 (17-item or 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression or Montgomery and Asberg Rating Scale) in each study arm. A meta-regression was conducted to adjust the comparison between observational studies and RCTs on treatment type, study characteristics and average patient characteristics. 12 observational studies and 109 RCTs involving 6757 and 11035 patients in 12 and 149 arms were included in the main analysis. Meta-regression showed that the standardised treatment response in RCTs is greater by a magnitude of 4.59 (2.61 to 6.56). Study characteristics were related to standardised treatment response, positively (study duration, number of follow-up assessments, outpatients versus inpatients, per protocol analysis versus intention to treat analysis) or negatively (blinded design, placebo design). At patient level, response increased with baseline severity and decreased with age. Results of the second analysis were consistent with this. Conclusions: Response to antidepressants is greater in RCTs than in observational studies. Observational studies should be considered as a necessary complement to RCTs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effectiveness of mindfulness yoga on patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Miao, Chuyuan
    Gao, Yun
    Li, Xiaohua
    Zhou, Ying
    Chung, Joanne Wai-yee
    Smith, Graeme D.
    BMC COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE AND THERAPIES, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [42] Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Older People: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Gould, Rebecca L.
    Coulson, Mark C.
    Howard, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 (10) : 1817 - 1830
  • [43] The Generalizability of Randomized Controlled Trials of Self-Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depressive Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis
    Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo
    Johns, Emily
    Keefe, John R.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (11)
  • [44] Quetiapine monotherapy in acute phase for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials
    Maneeton, Narong
    Maneeton, Benchalak
    Srisurapanont, Manit
    Martin, Stephen D.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 12
  • [45] Placebo Response and Its Predictors in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analysis and Comparison of Meta-Regression and MetaForest
    Castells, Xavier
    Saez, Marc
    Barcheni, Maghie
    Cunill, Ruth
    Serrano, Domenec
    Lopez, Beatriz
    van Lissa, Caspar J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 25 (01) : 26 - 35
  • [46] Efficacy of inpatient psychotherapy for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
    Schefft, C.
    Guhn, A.
    Brakemeier, E. -L.
    Sterzer, P.
    Koehler, S.
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 139 (04) : 322 - 335
  • [47] Acupuncture for musculoskeletal pain: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of sham-controlled randomized clinical trials
    Yuan, Qi-ling
    Wang, Peng
    Liu, Liang
    Sun, Fu
    Cai, Yong-song
    Wu, Wen-tao
    Ye, Mao-lin
    Ma, Jiang-tao
    Xu, Bang-bang
    Zhang, Yin-gang
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [48] Dose-response relation between dietary sodium and blood pressure: a meta-regression analysis of 133 randomized controlled trials
    Graudal, Niels
    Hubeck-Graudal, Thorbjorn
    Jurgens, Gesche
    Taylor, Rod S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2019, 109 (05) : 1273 - 1278
  • [49] The prognostic significance of the alterations of pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sung, Shih-Hsien
    Yeh, Wan-Yu
    Chiang, Chern-En
    Huang, Chi-Jung
    Huang, Wei-Ming
    Chen, Chen-Huan
    Cheng, Hao-Min
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [50] The effects of bupropion alone and combined with naltrexone on weight loss: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Yang
    Han, Fei
    Xia, Zefeng
    Sun, Ping
    Rohani, Pejman
    Amirthalingam, Palanisamy
    Sohouli, Mohammad Hassan
    DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME, 2024, 16 (01)