Anisotropy influence on hysteresis and additional loss in silicon steel sheets

被引:10
作者
Moses, AJ [1 ]
Pluta, WA
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Sch Engn Res, Wolfson Ctr Magnet Technol, POB 925, Cardiff CF24 0YF, Wales
[2] Czestochowa Tech Univ, Inst Electroenergenet, Czestochowa, Poland
关键词
magnetic loss; electrical steel; texture; hysteresis; anomally factor; loss separation;
D O I
10.1002/srin.200506037
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Non- and grain-oriented electrical steels were tested in an Epstein frame. The materials were magnetised under sinusoidal flux waveform at 20, 50 and 150 Hz. Loss was separated into hysteresis, eddy current and excess loss components. The relationship between the hysteresis angle, additional loss factor and the magnetocrystalline anisotropy was shown. It was found that both hysteresis and additional losses are strongly dependent on the texture showing opposite trends as the flux density increases. The aim of the present paper is to provide a contribution to the understanding of magnetic losses in soft metallic ferromagnetic materials.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 454
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
BAJOREK R, 2000, 6 INT WORKSH 1 2 DIM
[2]  
BERLOTTI G, 1981, IEEE T MAGN, V17, P2852
[3]   GENERAL-PROPERTIES OF POWER LOSSES IN SOFT FERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS [J].
BERTOTTI, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1988, 24 (01) :621-630
[4]  
Cullity B. D., 1972, INTRO MAGNETIC MAT
[5]   Anisotropy of the magnetic losses components in semi-processed electrical steels [J].
Landgraf, FJG ;
Emura, M ;
Teixeira, JC ;
de Campos, MF ;
Muranaka, CS .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 1999, 196 :380-381
[6]   ELECTRICAL STEELS - PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE-DEVELOPMENTS [J].
MOSES, AJ .
IEE PROCEEDINGS-A-SCIENCE MEASUREMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 137 (05) :233-245
[7]  
NALECZ M, 1965, MAGNETC MESUREMENTS
[8]  
PLUTA WA, 2001, THESIS TU LODZ LODZ
[9]  
SOISKI M, 1994, HDB MAGNETIC MAT, V8
[10]   THE EFFECTS OF GRAIN-SIZE ON THE CORE LOSS AND PERMEABILITY OF MOTOR LAMINATION STEEL [J].
STEPHENSON, ET ;
MARDER, AR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1986, 22 (02) :101-106