Barriers to Completing Delayed Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy: a Critical Need for Patient and Clinician Education

被引:6
|
作者
Ogrodnik, Aleksandra [1 ,2 ]
MacLennan, Susan [3 ,4 ]
Weaver, Donald [5 ,6 ]
James, Ted [3 ]
机构
[1] Danbury Hosp, Dept Surg, Danbury, CT USA
[2] Residency 24 Hosp Ave, Dept Gen Surg Residency, Danbury, CT 06810 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Surg, 89 Beaumont Ave,Given Bldg, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Dept Pathol, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[6] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, 89 Beaumont Ave,Courtyard Given S269, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast reconstruction; Decision-making; Quality improvement; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; DECISION-MAKING; POSTMASTECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; SUPPORT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s13187-016-1046-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Rates of breast reconstruction following mastectomy vary widely, and little is known about why women who originally express an interest in breast reconstruction do not receive it. Improved documentation of clinical decision-making is one of the potential benefits of the electronic health record (EHR), and may serve as a tool to enhance patient-centered, clinical outcomes research. The goals of this study were to explore patterns in delayed reconstruction (DR), identify barriers to follow through, and to determine the adequacy of EHR documentation in providing information about decision-making for breast reconstruction. Retrospective EHR review of women undergoing mastectomy, 2008-2012, was conducted in an academic medical center in New England. Data included patient demographics, cancer stage, co-morbidity index, post-mastectomy reconstruction status, and documented decision-making regarding reconstruction. Of 367 women who had undergone a total mastectomy, 219 did not receive immediate reconstruction. Of these, 24.6 % expressed no interest in DR, 21.9 % expressed interest but were still pending the procedure, and 5.9 % had completed DR. Of decision-making regarding breast reconstruction, 47.5 % lacked documentation. Median follow-up was 34 months. Reasons for not following through with DR included poor timing (25 %), indecision (17 %), desired method of reconstruction not available at treating facility (10 %), persistent obesity (8.3 %), continued smoking (4 %), and reason not specified (35 %). Many women do not receive breast reconstruction despite expressing an initial interest in the procedure. Reasons were multi-factorial and the extent of documentation was inconsistent. Further exploration of potential barriers to breast reconstruction as well as opportunities to enhance shared decision-making may serve to improve patient experience and satisfaction following mastectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:700 / 706
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The rate of immediate reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer varies by patient race
    J. F. Tseng
    S. J. Kronowitz
    K. K. Hunt
    C. C. Sun
    G. V. Babiera
    E. Singletary
    F. Meric-Bernstam
    M. J. Ross
    B. W. Feig
    H. M. Kuerer
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2004, 11 : S92 - S92
  • [32] Uptake of breast reconstruction following mastectomy: a Gold Coast experience
    Ho, Debbie
    Chan, Erick
    Izwan, Sara
    Ng, Justin
    Teng, Roy
    Swindon, Daisy
    Chang, Jennifer
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (11) : 3011 - 3016
  • [33] Patient-reported outcomes following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: comparing implant-based with autologous breast reconstruction
    Misere, Renee M. L.
    Joosen, Milou E. M.
    Claassens, Eva L.
    de Grzymala, Andrzej A. Piatkowski
    Heuts, Esther M.
    van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 45 (05) : 763 - 769
  • [34] Changes in Psychosocial Functioning 1 Year After Mastectomy Alone, Delayed Breast Reconstruction, or Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Kelly A. Metcalfe
    John Semple
    May-Lynn Quan
    Susan T. Vadaparampil
    Claire Holloway
    Mitch Brown
    Bethanne Bower
    Ping Sun
    Steven A. Narod
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2012, 19 : 233 - 241
  • [35] A Population-Based Study of Breast Cancer-Specific Survival Following Mastectomy and Immediate or Early-Delayed Breast Reconstruction
    Agarwal, Jayant
    Agarwal, Shailesh
    Pappas, Lisa
    Neumayer, Leigh
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (03) : 226 - 232
  • [36] Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: comparative analysis of early and delayed reconstruction
    Seidel, William
    Bins-Ely, Jorge
    Ongaratto Barazzetti, Daniel
    Della Giustina, Renata
    Walter, Gustavo P.
    Feri, Thiago A.
    Maurici, Rosemeri
    Narciso-Schiavon, Janaina L.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2017, 72 (03) : 188 - 199
  • [37] Understanding patient choices regarding breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer
    P. S. Soon
    S. Ruban
    H. T. J. Mo
    R. Lee
    L. Saliba
    A. Shah
    D. Segara
    S. Yarrow
    A. Girgis
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, 27 : 2135 - 2142
  • [38] The recurrence pattern following delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer suggests a systemic effect of surgery on occult dormant micrometastases
    Hanna Dillekås
    Romano Demicheli
    Ilaria Ardoino
    Svein A. H. Jensen
    Elia Biganzoli
    Oddbjørn Straume
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 158 : 169 - 178
  • [39] Patient-reported outcomes in bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction: A narrative review
    Ticha, Pavla
    Sukop, Andrej
    BREAST, 2024, 73
  • [40] Patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes following mastectomy for breast cancer, with immediate, delayed or no breast reconstruction: Four-year follow-up from a prospective cohort study
    Dempsey, Kathy
    Mathieu, Erin
    Brennan, Meagan
    Snook, Kylie
    Hoffman, Julia
    Campbell, Ian
    Scarlet, Jenni
    Flay, Heather
    Wong, April
    Boyle, Frances
    King, Madeleine
    Spillane, Andrew
    BREAST, 2023, 71 : 122 - 131