Using anticipatory life cycle assessment to enable future sustainable construction

被引:38
作者
Goswein, Verena [1 ]
Rodrigues, Carla [2 ]
Silvestre, Jose D. [1 ]
Freire, Fausto [2 ]
Habert, Guillaume [3 ]
Konig, Jakob [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Dept Civil Engn Architecture & Georesources, ICERIS, Av Rovisco Pais 1, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, ADAI LAETA, Dept Mech Engn, Polo 2 Campus, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, IBI, Chair Sustainable Construct, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Jozef Stefan Inst, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
anticipatory life cycle assessment (a-LCA); ecodesign; environmental assessment; external wall; foresight; industrial ecology; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; BUILDING SYSTEMS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; USER INVOLVEMENT; EMBODIED ENERGY; ASSESSMENT LCA; IMPACT; CARBON; HOUSE; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12916
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The built environment is the largest single emitter of CO2 and an important consumer of energy. Much research has gone into the improved efficiency of building operation and construction products. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is commonly used to assess existing buildings or building products. Classic LCA, however, is not suited for evaluating the environmental performance of developing technologies. A new approach, anticipatory LCA (a-LCA), promises various advantages and can be used as a design constraint during the product development stage. It helps overcome four challenges: (i) data availability, (ii) stakeholder inclusion, (iii) risk assessment, and (iv) multi-criteria problems. This article's contribution to the line of research is twofold: first, it adapts the a-LCA approach for construction-specific purposes in theoretical terms for the four challenges. Second, it applies the method to an innovative prefabricated modular envelope system, the CleanTechBlock (CTB), focusing on challenge (i). Thirty-six CTB designs are tested and compared to conventional walls. Inclusion of technology foresight is achieved through structured scenario analysis. Moreover, challenge (iv) is tackled through the analysis of different environmental impact categories, transport-related impacts, and thickness of the wall assemblies of the CTB. The case study results show that optimized material choice and product design is needed to reach the lowest environmental impact. Methodological findings highlight the importance of context-specific solutions and the need for benchmarking new products.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 192
页数:15
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
ADENE, 2015, IMPL EN PERF BUILD D, V4
[2]   Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review [J].
Anand, Chirjiv Kaur ;
Amor, Ben .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 :408-416
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Trade-Off Analytics: Creating and Exploring the System Tradespace
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, THESIS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Official Journal of the European Union, L153 of, V18, P13, DOI DOI 10.3000/17252555.L_2010.153.ENG
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment
[8]  
Principles and Framework
[9]   Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Epitaxial Graphene Production at Different Manufacturing Scales and Maturity [J].
Arvidsson, Rickard ;
Molander, Sverker .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 21 (05) :1153-1164
[10]   Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland [J].
Asif, M. ;
Muneer, T. ;
Kelley, R. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 42 (03) :1391-1394