Prospective comparison of 3 γ-probes for sentinel lymph node detection in 200 breast cancer patients

被引:0
作者
Classe, JM
Fiche, M
Rousseau, C
Sagan, C
Dravet, F
Pioud, R
Lisbona, A
Ferrer, L
Campion, L
Resche, I
Curtet, C
机构
[1] Rene Gauducheau Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, St Herblain, France
[2] Hosp Laennec, Dept Histopathol, St Herblain, France
[3] Univ Laennec, St Herblain, France
[4] Rene Gauducheau Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, St Herblain, France
[5] Rene Gauducheau Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, St Herblain, France
[6] Rene Gauducheau Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, St Herblain, France
[7] INSERM, Unite 463, Nantes, France
关键词
breast cancer; sentinel lymph node; gamma-probe;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Previous reports have shown that axillary sentinel lymph node (ASLN) radiodetection allows accurate axillary staging for patients with early breast cancer. Radioguided surgery implies the use of a gamma-probe to count the emitted radioactivity of marked ASLNs. Several gamma-probes are commercially available, each with its own properties. The clinical impact of the type of gamma-probe used for ASLN radiodetection remains to be evaluated. Methods: Three commercially available gamma-probes were evaluated: a scintillator with a bismuth germanate crystal (probe A), a semiconductor with a cadmium telluride crystal (probe B), and a semiconductor with a cadmium zinc telluride crystal (probe C). Two hundred patients with early breast cancer were prospectively enrolled to undergo ASLN radiodetection and axillary lymphadenectomy. ASLN mapping consisted of injecting Tc-99m-sulfur-colloid around the tumor. For each patient, sentinel lymph nodes were counted successively with the 3 probes and the sensitivity of each gamma-probe was determined from ASLN residual activity. The results of detection rates and false-negative rates for each probe were compared. Results: Mean residual ASLN activity was 52 kBq (range, 0.07-189 kBq). Sensitivity was compared among the 3 probes and found to be best for probe A. The detection rate of probe A was significantly better than that of probe B (93% vs. 86%, P = 0.05) but not different from that of probe C (93% vs. 90%). No differences in false-negative rates were observed among the 3 probes. Conclusion: ASLN detection rate depends on the type of gamma-probe used. Because failure to detect the ASLN leads to complete axillary lymphadenectomy, involving local morbidity and other sequelae, the type of gamma-probe must be considered important for sentinel lymph node radiodetection.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 399
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [11] HARKE H, 1988, J NUCL MED, V29, P881
  • [12] The sentinel node in breast cancer - A multicenter validation study
    Krag, D
    Weaver, D
    Ashikaga, T
    Moffat, F
    Klimberg, VS
    Shriver, C
    Feldman, S
    Kusminsky, R
    Gadd, M
    Kuhn, J
    Harlow, S
    Beitsch, P
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (14) : 941 - 946
  • [13] SURGICAL RESECTION AND RADIOLOCALIZATION OF THE SENTINEL LYMPH-NODE IN BREAST-CANCER USING A GAMMA-PROBE
    KRAG, DN
    WEAVER, DL
    ALEX, JC
    FAIRBANK, JT
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 1993, 2 (06): : 335 - 340
  • [14] Highest isotope count does not predict sentinel node positivity in all breast cancer patients
    Martin, RCG
    Fey, J
    Yeung, H
    Borgen, PI
    Cody, HS
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 8 (07) : 592 - 597
  • [15] Results of a breast-cancer-surgery trial compared with observational data from routine practice
    Marubini, E
    Mariani, L
    Salvadori, B
    Veronesi, U
    Saccozzi, R
    Merson, M
    Zucali, R
    Rilke, F
    [J]. LANCET, 1996, 347 (9007) : 1000 - 1003
  • [16] Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy for breast cancer - Not yet the standard of care
    McMasters, KM
    Giuliano, AE
    Ross, MI
    Reintgen, DS
    Hunt, KK
    Byrd, DR
    Klimberg, VS
    Whitworth, PW
    Tafra, LC
    Edwards, MJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (14) : 990 - 995
  • [17] AXILLARY NODE DISSECTION FOR EARLY BREAST-CANCER - SOME IS GOOD, BUT ALL IS BETTER
    MOFFAT, FL
    SENOFSKY, GM
    DAVIS, K
    CLARK, KC
    ROBINSON, DS
    KETCHAM, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 51 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [18] MORTON DL, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P392
  • [19] Clinical impact of false-negative sentinel node biopsy in primary breast cancer
    Nano, MT
    Kollias, J
    Farshid, G
    Gill, PG
    Bochner, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (11) : 1430 - 1434
  • [20] The learning curve for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer - Practical considerations
    Orr, RK
    Hoehn, JL
    Col, NF
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1999, 134 (07) : 764 - 767