Methods for Evaluating Causality in Observational Studies

被引:47
|
作者
Gianicolo, Emilio A. L. [1 ,2 ]
Eichler, Martin [3 ]
Muensterer, Oliver [4 ]
Strauch, Konstantin [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Blettner, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr, IMBEI, Mainz, Germany
[2] Italian Natl Res Council, Inst Clin Physiol, Lecce, Italy
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Med Clin 1, Dresden, Germany
[4] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Fac Med, Dept Pediat Surg, Mainz, Germany
[5] Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen German Res Ctr Environm, Inst Genet Epidemiol, Neuherberg, Germany
[6] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Med Informat Proc Biometry & Epidemiol, Genet Epidemiol, Neuherberg, Germany
来源
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL | 2020年 / 117卷 / 07期
关键词
REGRESSION DISCONTINUITY DESIGNS; PUBLIC-HEALTH; SERIES; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.3238/arztebl.2020.0101
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In clinical medical research. causality is demonstrated by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Often, however, an RCT cannot be conducted for ethical reasons, and sometimes for practical reasons as well. In such cases, knowledge can be derived from an observational study instead. In this article, we present two methods that have not been widely used in medical research to date. Methods: The methods of assessing causal inferences in observational studies are described on the basis of publications retrieved by a selective literature search. Results: Two relatively new approaches-regression-discontinuity methods and interrupted time series-can be used to demonstrate a causal relationship under certain circumstances. The regression-discontinuity design is a quasi-experimental approach that can be applied if a continuous assignment variable is used with a threshold value. Patients are assigned to different treatment schemes on the basis of the threshold value. For assignment variables that are subject to random measurement error, it is assumed that, in a small interval around a threshold value, e.g.. cholesterol values of 160 mg/dL, subjects are assigned essentially at random to one of two treatment groups. If patients with a value above the threshold are given a certain treatment, those with values below the threshold can serve as control group. Interrupted time series are a special type of regression-discontinuity design in which time is the assignment variable, and the threshold is a cutoff point. This is often an extemal event, such as the imposition of a smoking ban. A before-and-after comparison can be used to determine the effect of the intervention (e.g.. the smoking ban) on health parameters such as the frequency of cardiovascular disease. Conclusion: The approaches described here can be used to derive causal inferences from observational studies. They should only be applied after the prerequisites for their use have been carefully checked.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 107
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Longitudinal observational studies and causality
    Muriel, Alfonso
    Hernandez-Marrero, Domingo
    Abraira, Victor
    NEFROLOGIA, 2012, 32 (01): : 12 - 14
  • [2] Observational studies identify associations, not causality
    Berry, AJ
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (04): : 1238 - 1238
  • [3] Considerations about causality in observational studies
    Venturin, Bruna
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-AMERICAS, 2022, 6
  • [4] Temporal sequence in observational studies to establish causality
    Silva Aycaguer, Luis Carlos
    MEDWAVE, 2014, 14 (04):
  • [5] Statistical Note: Confounding and Causality in Observational Studies
    Horvat, Christopher
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (05) : 496 - 498
  • [6] Commentary: Causality - the Achilles' heel of observational studies
    Flather, MD
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7208): : 488 - 489
  • [7] Sensitivity analysis for causality in observational studies for regulatory science
    Diaz, Ivan
    Lee, Hana
    Kiciman, Emre
    Schenck, Edward J.
    Akacha, Mouna
    Follman, Dean
    Ghosh, Debashis
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [8] Authors' reply for "Considerations about causality in observational studies"
    Wen, Bo
    Xu, Rongbin
    Wu, Yao
    Zanotti Stagliorio Coelho, Micheline de Sousa
    Nascimento Saldiva, Paulo Hilario
    Guo, Yuming
    Li, Shanshan
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-AMERICAS, 2022, 6
  • [9] Using Mendelian randomisation to assess causality in observational studies
    Pagoni, Panagiota
    Dimou, Niki L.
    Murphy, Neil
    Stergiakouli, Evie
    EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 22 (02) : 67 - 71
  • [10] Evaluating sources of bias in observational studies
    Corrao, Giovanni
    Rea, Federico
    Mancia, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2021, 39 (04) : 604 - 606