Bone marrow trephine combined with immunohistochemistry is superior to bone marrow aspirate in follow-up of myeloma patients

被引:37
作者
Joshi, R. [1 ,2 ]
Horncastle, D. [1 ,2 ]
Elderfield, K. [1 ,2 ]
Lampert, I. [1 ,2 ]
Rahemtulla, A. [1 ,2 ]
Naresh, K. N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hammersmith Hosp, Dept Histopathol, London W12 0HS, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jcp.2007.049130
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Aims: Multiple myeloma ( MM) guidelines in the UK do not advocate performing bone marrow trephine biopsy (BMTB) during follow-up. In a recent study, it was found that the plasma cell per cent (PC%) in BMTB performed at the time of autologous stem cell transplant strongly correlated with survival. The current study addresses whether BMTB is superior to bone marrow aspiration (BMA) in documenting presence of disease and its volume at follow-up. Methods: The study involved 106 samples. A conventional 500-cell differential count was performed on the BMAs to document the PC%. The PC% on BMTBs had been estimated on CD138 immunostain. Furthermore, BMTBs had also been immunostained for CD56, cyclin D1 and light chains. Results: The mean (2SEM) PC% values in BMAs and BMTBs were 13.1 (2.6)% and 31.8 (5.8)% respectively. Based on BMA, BMTB and serum/urine paraprotein or light chain estimation, on 92 occasions (89%) there was detectable disease. The positive predictive value of both BMA and BMTB was 100%, and the negative predictive values for BMTB and BMA were 57% and 22% respectively. Among 98 secretory MM cases, the BMTB-PC% showed significant correlation with paraprotein levels, whereas BMA-PC% did not. Conclusions: It is strongly recommended that BMTB is performed and adequately investigated with immunohistochemistry during follow-up of MM.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 216
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] BONE-MARROW HISTOLOGY IN MYELOMA - ITS IMPORTANCE IN DIAGNOSIS, PROGNOSIS, CLASSIFICATION AND STAGING
    BARTL, R
    FRISCH, B
    BURKHARDT, R
    FATEHMOGHADAM, A
    MAHL, G
    GIERSTER, P
    SUND, M
    KETTNER, G
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1982, 51 (03) : 361 - 375
  • [2] Molecular pathogenesis and a consequent classification of multiple myeloma
    Bergsagel, PL
    Kuehl, WM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (26) : 6333 - 6338
  • [3] Blade Joan, 1998, British Journal of Haematology, V102, P1115, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00930.x
  • [4] Audit of bone marrow aspirates and trephine biopsies in multiple myeloma - a single centre study
    Charles, KS
    Winfield, DA
    Angel, C
    Goepel, J
    [J]. CLINICAL AND LABORATORY HAEMATOLOGY, 2004, 26 (06): : 403 - 406
  • [5] Chilosi M, 1999, MODERN PATHOL, V12, P1101
  • [6] The Mi15 monoclonal antibody (anti-Syndecan-1) is a reliable marker for quantifying plasma cells in paraffin-embedded bone marrow biopsy specimens
    Costes, V
    Magen, V
    Legouffe, E
    Durand, L
    Baldet, P
    Rossi, JF
    Klein, B
    Brochier, J
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1999, 30 (12) : 1405 - 1411
  • [7] Expression of CD56/neural cell adhesion molecule correlates with the presence of lytic bone lesions in multiple myeloma and distinguishes myeloma from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and lymphomas with plasmacytoid differentiation
    Ely, SA
    Knowles, DM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2002, 160 (04) : 1293 - 1299
  • [8] THE VALUE OF THE BONE-MARROW PLASMA-CELL CYTOPLASMIC LIGHT CHAIN RATIO IN DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN MULTIPLE-MYELOMA AND MONOCLONAL GAMMOPATHY OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE
    MAJUMDAR, G
    GRACE, RJ
    SINGH, AK
    SLATER, NGP
    [J]. LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 1992, 8 (06) : 491 - 493
  • [9] Neural cell adhesion molecule expression in plasma cells in bone marrow biopsies and aspirates allows discrimination between multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and polyclonal plasmacytosis
    Martín, P
    Santón, A
    Bellas, C
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2004, 44 (04) : 375 - 380
  • [10] Optimal processing of bone marrow trephine biopsy: the Hammersmith Protocol
    Naresh, K. N.
    Lampert, I.
    Hasserjian, R.
    D Lykidis
    Elderfield, K.
    D Horncastle
    Smith, N.
    Murray-Brown, W.
    Stamp, G. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 59 (09) : 903 - 911