Virtual reality distraction during uterovaginal brachytherapy applicators' removal: A pilot comparative study

被引:6
作者
Varnier, Romain [1 ]
Briere, Odile [2 ]
Brouillard, Thomas [2 ]
Martel-Lafay, Isabelle [1 ]
Serre, Anne-Agathe [1 ]
Couillet, Audrey [3 ]
Chvetzoff, Gisele [3 ]
Freulet, Cecile [2 ]
Pommier, Pascal [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Leon Berard, Dept Radiat Oncol, 28 Rue Laennec, F-69373 Lyon 08, France
[2] Ctr Leon Berard, Brachytherapy Unit, Lyon, France
[3] Ctr Leon Berard, Dept Support Care, Lyon, France
关键词
Brachytherapy; Cervical cancer; Acute toxicity; Anxiety; Pain; Virtual reality; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; GUIDED ADAPTIVE BRACHYTHERAPY; ADVANCED CERVICAL-CANCER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; ANXIETY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2021.03.017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To assess the relevance of virtual reality distraction (VR) during uterovaginal brachytherapy applicators' removal, as an alternative to nitrous oxide (N2O) conscious sedation, to decrease anxiety and pain perception. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We prospectively evaluated 35 patients treated with cervical brachytherapy for locally or locally advanced cervical cancer. Brachytherapy applicators were removed in the patient's room at the end of the treatment. Patients were assigned to N2O conscious sedation (reference group) or VR (experimental group). Anxiety and pain were evaluated with the STAI-E score and with Visual Analogical Scales (VAS). RESULTS: Fourteen patients were treated with VR and 21 with N2O. STAI-E baselines scores were 35 in the VR group and 38 in the reference group and declined to 30 and 28, respectively after procedure. The mean VAS-anxiety was 2.9 before and 2.7 at the peak in the VR group versus 4.1 and 1.6, respectively in the reference group. The mean VAS-pain was 1.0 before, 3.1 at the peak and 0.4 after the procedure in the experimental group, versus 1.8, 2.0, and 0.6 respectively in the N2O group. Four patients in the VR group experienced mild nausea/vomiting or dizziness during the procedure. The preparation duration was higher in the VR group, with a similar duration for the removal itself. CONCLUSIONS: Replacing a medical gas by a virtual reality device was feasible and led to acceptable levels of pain and anxiety. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm efficacy and to determine which patients could benefit the most from this approach. (c) 2021 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 787
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1973, The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC)
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLIN PROV EFF
[3]   Effect of Pre-Procedural State-Trait Anxiety on Pain Perception and Discomfort in Women Undergoing Colposcopy for Cervical Cytological Abnormalities [J].
Baser, Eralp ;
Togrul, Cihan ;
Ozgu, Emre ;
Esercan, Alev ;
Caglar, Mete ;
Gungor, Tayfun .
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2013, 14 (07) :4053-4056
[4]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[5]  
Cancer col et corps uterus ovaires, LIG CANC
[6]   Clinical efficacy of virtual reality for acute procedural pain management: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chan, Evelyn ;
Foster, Samantha ;
Sambell, Ryan ;
Leong, Paul .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07)
[7]   Prostate brachytherapy under hypnosedation: A prospective evaluation [J].
Chapet, Olivier ;
Udrescu, Corina ;
Horn, Samy ;
Ruffion, Alain ;
Lorchel, Fabrice ;
Gaudioz, Sonya ;
Clamens, Cecile ;
Piriou, Vincent ;
Rigal, Edwige .
BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 18 (01) :22-28
[8]   Virtual Reality in Health System: Beyond Entertainment. A Mini-Review on the Efficacy of VR During Cancer Treatment [J].
Chirico, Andrea ;
Lucidi, Fabio ;
De Laurentiis, Michele ;
Milanese, Carla ;
Napoli, Alessandro ;
Giordano, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 231 (02) :275-287
[9]  
Cibula D, 2018, INT J GYNECOL CANCER, V28
[10]   A review of the safety of 50% nitrous oxide/oxygen in conscious sedation [J].
Collado, Valerie ;
Nicolas, Emmanuel ;
Faulks, Denise ;
Hennequin, Martine .
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2007, 6 (05) :559-571