Gait velocity and the Timed-Up-and-Go test were sensitive to changes in mobility in frail elderly patients

被引:116
作者
van Lersel, Marianne B. [1 ]
Munneke, Marten [2 ,3 ]
Esselink, Rianne A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Benraad, Carolien E. M. [4 ]
Rikkert, Marcel G. M. Olde [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Geriatr, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Physiotherapy, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Maria Mackenzie, Dept Old Age Psychiat, NL-6525 DZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
gait; mobility limitations; frail elderly; geriatric assessments; reproducibility of results; exercise test;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.016
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To estimate clinically relevant changes in functional mobility tests and quantitative gait measures at group and individual level in frail elderly patients. Study Design and Setting: This study was a cohort study of consecutively admitted frail elderly patients. Gait velocity; Timed-Up-and-Go test (TUG), and other mobility tests were measured on admission and 2 weeks later. In between, patients received multidisciplinary treatment. Three experts decided from video recordings if patients had a clinically relevant change in gait, defined as change in the expected risk of falling. Results: A total of 85 patients (mean age 75.8 years, 46 female) participated. Of whom, 45% had dementia; 59 patients were stable and 26 showed a clinically relevant change in gait. Gait velocity and TUG were most sensitive to change at group level. In individual patients, a 5% change from baseline in gait velocity and 9% change in TUG had a sensitivity of 92% and 93% for detection of clinically relevant change, but specificity of 27% and 34%, respectively. Conclusion: At group level, gait velocity and TUG were, from all investigated tests, most sensitive to change and in this perspective the best outcome variables. In individual patients, the high intraindividual variability makes these measures unsuitable as independent screening instruments for clinically relevant changes in gait. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 191
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A taxonomy for responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Katz, JN ;
Wright, JG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (12) :1204-1217
[2]  
BERG K, 1992, CAN J PUBLIC HLTH, V83, P7
[3]   Validity of 3 physical performance measures in inpatient geriatric rehabilitation [J].
Brooks, D ;
Davis, AM ;
Naglie, G .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 87 (01) :105-110
[4]   Prognostic value of usual gait speed in well-functioning older people-results from the health, aging and body composition study [J].
Cesari, M ;
Kritchevsky, SB ;
Penninx, BWHJ ;
Nicklas, BJ ;
Simonsick, EM ;
Newman, AB ;
Tylavsky, FA ;
Brach, JS ;
Satterfield, S ;
Bauer, DC ;
Visser, M ;
Rubin, SM ;
Harris, TB ;
Pahor, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2005, 53 (10) :1675-1680
[5]   Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life [J].
Crosby, RD ;
Kolotkin, RL ;
Williams, GR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (05) :395-407
[6]   Designing randomized, controlled trials aimed at preventing or delaying functional decline and disability in frail, older persons: A consensus report [J].
Ferrucci, L ;
Guralnik, JM ;
Studenski, S ;
Fried, LP ;
Cutler, GB ;
Walston, JD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (04) :625-634
[7]  
FIRST MB, 2005, DSM IV TR GUIDEBOOK, P95
[8]  
FOLSTEIN MF, 1983, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V40, P812
[9]   A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF SERIAL GAIT SPEED AS A MEASURE OF REHABILITATION IN THE ELDERLY [J].
FRIEDMAN, PJ ;
RICHMOND, DE ;
BASKETT, JJ .
AGE AND AGEING, 1988, 17 (04) :227-235
[10]   MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS [J].
GUYATT, G ;
WALTER, S ;
NORMAN, G .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02) :171-178