Is FDA-Approved Bevacizumab Cost-Effective When Included in the Treatment of Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer?

被引:6
作者
Chappell, Nicole P. [1 ]
Miller, Caela R. [1 ]
Fielden, Aaron D. [1 ]
Barnett, Jason C. [1 ]
机构
[1] San Antonio Mil Med Ctr, Ft Sam Houston, TX USA
关键词
EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; AMERICAN SOCIETY; CHEMOTHERAPY; TRIAL; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1200/JOP.2015.010470
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose:Although the Food and Drug Administration has approved incorporation of bevacizumab (BEV) into the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC), cost-value measures are an essential consideration, as evidenced by the recent ASCO Value Framework initiative. We assessed the cost-effectiveness and reviewed the net health benefit (NHB) of this expensive treatment.Methods:A cost-effectiveness decision model was constructed using results from a phase III trial comparing BEV plus cytotoxic chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone in patients with PROC. The Avastin Use in Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (AURELIA) trial demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival and quality of life in patients receiving BEV. Costs, paracentesis rates, and adverse events were incorporated, including subgroup analysis of different partner chemotherapy agents.Results:Inclusion of BEV in the treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer meets the common willingness-to-pay incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) threshold of $100,000 per progression-free life-year saved (LYS) for 15-mg/kg dosing and approaches this threshold for 10-mg/kg dosing, with an ICER of $160,000. In sensitivity analysis, reducing the cost of BEV by 13% (from $9,338 to $8,100 per cycle) allows 10-mg/kg dosing to reach a $100,000 ICER. Exploratory analysis of different BEV chemotherapy partners showed an ICER of $76,000 per progression-free LYS (6.5-month progression-free survival improvement) and $54,000 per LYS (9.1-month overall survival improvement) for the addition of BEV to paclitaxel once per week. Using the ASCO framework for value assessment, the NHB score for BEV plus paclitaxel once per week is 48.Conclusion:Using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 ICER, the addition of BEV to chemotherapy either demonstrates or approaches cost-effectiveness and NHB when added to the treatment of patients with PROC.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [11] American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options
    Schnipper, Lowell E.
    Davidson, Nancy E.
    Wollins, Dana S.
    Tyne, Courtney
    Blayney, Douglas W.
    Blum, Diane
    Dicker, Adam P.
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Hoverman, J. Russell
    Langdon, Robert
    Lyman, Gary H.
    Meropol, Neal J.
    Mulvey, Therese
    Newcomer, Lee
    Peppercorn, Jeffrey
    Polite, Blase
    Raghavan, Derek
    Rossi, Gregory
    Saltz, Leonard
    Schrag, Deborah
    Smith, Thomas J.
    Yu, Peter P.
    Hudis, Clifford A.
    Schilsky, Richard L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (23) : 2563 - U132
  • [12] A Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies in Ovarian Cancer
    Sfakianos, Gregory P.
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    [J]. CANCER CONTROL, 2011, 18 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [13] Cancer Statistics, 2014
    Siegel, Rebecca
    Ma, Jiemin
    Zou, Zhaohui
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2014, 64 (01) : 9 - 29
  • [14] American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion: The Integration of Palliative Care Into Standard Oncology Care
    Smith, Thomas J.
    Temin, Sarah
    Alesi, Erin R.
    Abernethy, Amy P.
    Balboni, Tracy A.
    Basch, Ethan M.
    Ferrell, Betty R.
    Loscalzo, Matt
    Meier, Diane E.
    Paice, Judith A.
    Peppercorn, Jeffrey M.
    Somerfield, Mark
    Stovall, Ellen
    Von Roenn, Jamie H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (08) : 880 - 887