National Working Group on the RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Goals, Resources, and Future Directions

被引：18

作者：

Harden, Samantha M. ^{[1
]}

Strayer, Thomas Edward, III ^{[1
,2
]}

Smith, Matthew Lee ^{[3
,4
,5
]}

Gaglio, Bridget ^{[6
]}

Ory, Marcia G. ^{[3
,4
]}

Rabin, Borsika ^{[7
,8
,9
,10
,11
]}

Estabrooks, Paul A. ^{[12
]}

Glasgow, Russell E. ^{[8
,9
,10
,11
]}

机构：

[1] Virginia Tech, Human Nutr Foods & Exercise, Phys Act Res & Community Implementat, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA

[2] Virginia Tech, Translat Biol Med & Hlth, Blacksburg, VA USA

[3] Texas A&M Univ, Ctr Populat Hlth & Aging, College Stn, TX USA

[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, College Stn, TX USA

[5] Univ Georgia, Dept Hlth Promot & Behav, Coll Publ Hlth, Athens, GA 30602 USA

[6] Patient Ctr Outcomes Res Inst, Clin Effectiveness & Decis Sci Program, Washington, DC USA

[7] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Dept Family Med & Publ Hlth, San Diego, CA 92103 USA

[8] Univ Colorado, Adult & Child Consortium Outcomes Res & Delivery, Sch Med, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA

[9] Univ Colorado, Dept Family Med, Sch Med, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA

[10] Univ Colorado, Eastern Colorado QUERI Program, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA

[11] Univ Colorado, GRECC Program, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA

[12] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Omaha, NE USA

来源：

FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH | 2020年 / 7卷

基金：

美国国家卫生研究院;

关键词：

dissemination; implementation; resources; application; synopsis; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; IMPROVE TRANSLATION; INTERVENTIONS; IMPACT; SUSTAINABILITY; TRIAL; GENERALIZABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; DISSEMINATION; PRINCIPLES;

D O I：

10.3389/fpubh.2019.00390

中图分类号：

R1 [预防医学、卫生学];

学科分类号：

1004 ; 120402 ;

摘要：

The National Working Group on RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework (herein Workgroup) was established in 2004 to support the application of the framework and advance dissemination and implementation science (D&I). Workgroup members developed and disseminated products and resources (and continue to do so) to advocate for consistent application of RE-AIM and allow for cross study comparisons. The purpose of this paper is to summarize key Workgroup activities, products, and services (e.g., webinars, consultations, planning tools) and enhance bidirectional communication between the Workgroup and RE-AIM users. The ultimate goal of this work is to serve as a forum for dissemination to improve the balance between RE-AIM user demand (needs) and the currently limited RE-AIM Workgroup supply (consultation and resources) to demonstrate and expand the utility of RE-AIM as a D&I planning and evaluation framework. A summary of resources is provided as well as specific examples of how the Workgroup has been responsive to user needs.

引用

页数：7

共 50 条

[31] Aligning the planning, development, and implementation of complex interventions to local contexts with an equity focus: application of the PRISM/RE-AIM Framework
Jolles, Monica Perez
Fort, Meredith P.
Glasgow, Russell E.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2024, 23 (01)
[32] Benefits and challenges in the use of RE-AIM for evaluation of a national social work staffing program in the veterans health administration
Cornell, Portia Y.
Hua, Cassandra L.
Halladay, Christopher W.
Halaszynski, Jaime
Harmon, Alita
Koget, Jennifer
Silva, Jennifer W.
FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2023, 3
[33] What happened in the 'Move for Well-being in School': a process evaluation of a cluster randomized physical activity intervention using the RE-AIM framework
Smedegaard, Soren
Brondeel, Ruben
Christiansen, Lars Breum
Skovgaard, Thomas
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2017, 14
[34] Scaling-up an evidence-based intervention for osteoarthritis in real-world settings: a pragmatic evaluation using the RE-AIM framework
Walker, Andrew
Boaz, Annette
Gibney, Amber
Zambelli, Zoe
Hurley, Michael V.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 1 (01):
[35] Involving the headteacher in the development of school-based health interventions: A mixed-methods outcome and process evaluation using the RE-AIM framework
Christian, Danielle L.
Todd, Charlotte
Rance, Jaynie
Stratton, Gareth
Mackintosh, Kelly A.
Rapport, Frances
Brophy, Sinead
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (04):
[36] Study protocol Implementation of the Veder contact method (VCM) in daily nursing home care for people with dementia: an evaluation based on the RE-AIM framework
Boersma, Petra
Van Weert, Julia C. M.
van Meijel, Berno
van de Ven, Peter M.
Droes, Rose-Marie
AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2017, 21 (07) : 730 - 741
[37] What happened in the ‘Move for Well-being in School’: a process evaluation of a cluster randomized physical activity intervention using the RE-AIM framework
Søren Smedegaard
Ruben Brondeel
Lars Breum Christiansen
Thomas Skovgaard
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14
[38] Integrating STEADI for Falls Prevention in Outpatient Rehabilitation Clinics: An Outcomes Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework
Vincenzo, Jennifer L.
Caulley, Jamie
Scott, Aaron J.
Wilson, Brian S.
Wingood, Mariana
Curran, Geoffrey M.
GERONTOLOGIST, 2024, 64 (04)
[39] NHI-PharmaCloud in Taiwan-A preliminary evaluation using the RE-AIM framework and lessons learned
Huang, San-Kuei
Wang, Pen-Jen
Tseng, Wen-Fuh
Syu, Fei-Kai
Lee, Miaw-Chwen
Shih, Ru-Liang
Sheen, Mao-Ting
Chen, Michael S.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 84 (10) : 817 - 825
[40] The RE-AIM framework-based evaluation of the implementation of the Maternal and Child Health Handbook program in Angola: a mixed methods study
Aoki, Ai
Mochida, Keiji
Kuramata, Michiru
Sadamori, Toru
Bhandari, Aliza K. C.
Freitas, Helga Reis
da Cunha, Joao Domingos
Francisco, Ketha Rubuz
Sapalalo, Pedro
Tchicondingosse, Lino
Balogun, Olukunmi Omobolanle
Aiga, Hirotsugu
Takehara, Kenji
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →