State of the art on conceptions of quality in higher education

被引:0
作者
Calamet, F. E. R. N. A. N. D. O. GuSTAvO ACEvEDO [1 ]
BENiTO, FiORELLA G. A. G. O. [1 ,2 ]
MuNOz, MARiA A. L. E. J. A. N. D. R. A. D. A. SiLvA [1 ]
OLivERA, A. N. A. LuCiA B. A. S. T. O. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Republica, Ctr Univ Reg Noreste, Montevideo, Uruguay
[2] Univ Republica, Ctr Univ Reg Noreste, Montevideo, Uruguay
来源
SOPHIA-COLECCION DE FILOSOFIA DE LA EDUCACION | 2021年 / 32期
关键词
Higher education; quality; literature review; state of the art; PRISMA-P method; targeted policies; ASSURANCE; UNIVERSITY; PERCEPTIONS; STANDARDS; SEARCH; VIEW;
D O I
10.17163/soph.n32.2022.03
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Given the polyseinic and multidimensional nature of the notion of quality and its centrality and growing relevance in higher education, it is necessary to lay the foundations for conceptualizing it in terms of its context of application, in order to provide support and consistency to the design of specific policies. This paper presents the main methodological guidelines and findings of an exhaustive literature review focused on identifying the conceptions of quality in higher education in papers published in high impact international journals between 2016-2020. Following the axial guidelines of the PRISMA-F method, 186 articles were selected out of 53,290 identified as part of the initial universe. Using open deductive coding, prevailing conceptions of the quality of higher education and its valued components were identified. Another noteworthy finding is the relevance of grouping these conceptions into two categories -"quality en soi" and "quality pour soi"- which are very similar to the positions taken in two very influential publications in Latin America. A crucial question arose as a consequence of the analysis of the articles submitted for review: who is responsible for determining the quality of a product or service in higher education? The answer to this question gave rise to the emergence of an alternative theoretical and conceptual positioning to those underlying the two categories: "quality pour qui" (quality for whom).
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 150
页数:32
相关论文
共 119 条
[21]  
Boyle P., 1997, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V22, P111, DOI DOI 10.1080/0260293970220202
[22]  
Brennan J., 2018, European Journal of Higher Education, V8, P249, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1474776, DOI 10.1080/21568235.2018.1474776]
[23]  
CABRERA Vistremundo, 2005, REV IBEROAMERI CANA, V36, P1, DOI [10.35362/rie36122886, DOI 10.35362/RIE36122886]
[24]  
CARDENAS MARIN William, 2016, SOPHIA COLECCION FIL, V20, P103, DOI [10.17163/soph.n20.2016.04, DOI 10.17163/S0PH.N20.2016.04]
[25]   Internal quality assurance: A new culture or added bureaucracy? [J].
Cardoso, Sonia ;
Rosa, Maria J. ;
Videira, Pedro ;
Amaral, Alberto .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (02) :249-262
[26]   Why is quality in higher education not achieved? The view of academics [J].
Cardoso, Sonia ;
Rosa, Maria J. ;
Stensaker, Bjorn .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 41 (06) :950-965
[27]  
Rodríguez-Morales PC, 2017, REV ELECTRON CALID E, V8, P87, DOI 10.22458/caes.v8i2.1541
[28]  
Cheng M, 2017, QUAL HIGH EDUC, V23, P153, DOI 10.1080/13538322.2017.1358954
[29]   Quality as transformation: educational metamorphosis [J].
Cheng, Ming .
QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 20 (03) :272-289
[30]   'Transforming the learner' versus 'passing the exam': Understanding the gap between academic and student definitions of quality [J].
Cheng, Ming .
QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 17 (01) :3-17