State of the art on conceptions of quality in higher education

被引:0
作者
Calamet, F. E. R. N. A. N. D. O. GuSTAvO ACEvEDO [1 ]
BENiTO, FiORELLA G. A. G. O. [1 ,2 ]
MuNOz, MARiA A. L. E. J. A. N. D. R. A. D. A. SiLvA [1 ]
OLivERA, A. N. A. LuCiA B. A. S. T. O. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Republica, Ctr Univ Reg Noreste, Montevideo, Uruguay
[2] Univ Republica, Ctr Univ Reg Noreste, Montevideo, Uruguay
来源
SOPHIA-COLECCION DE FILOSOFIA DE LA EDUCACION | 2021年 / 32期
关键词
Higher education; quality; literature review; state of the art; PRISMA-P method; targeted policies; ASSURANCE; UNIVERSITY; PERCEPTIONS; STANDARDS; SEARCH; VIEW;
D O I
10.17163/soph.n32.2022.03
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Given the polyseinic and multidimensional nature of the notion of quality and its centrality and growing relevance in higher education, it is necessary to lay the foundations for conceptualizing it in terms of its context of application, in order to provide support and consistency to the design of specific policies. This paper presents the main methodological guidelines and findings of an exhaustive literature review focused on identifying the conceptions of quality in higher education in papers published in high impact international journals between 2016-2020. Following the axial guidelines of the PRISMA-F method, 186 articles were selected out of 53,290 identified as part of the initial universe. Using open deductive coding, prevailing conceptions of the quality of higher education and its valued components were identified. Another noteworthy finding is the relevance of grouping these conceptions into two categories -"quality en soi" and "quality pour soi"- which are very similar to the positions taken in two very influential publications in Latin America. A crucial question arose as a consequence of the analysis of the articles submitted for review: who is responsible for determining the quality of a product or service in higher education? The answer to this question gave rise to the emergence of an alternative theoretical and conceptual positioning to those underlying the two categories: "quality pour qui" (quality for whom).
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 150
页数:32
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
Acevedo Fernando, 2021, Rev. iberoam. educ. super, V12, P145, DOI 10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2021.34.984
[2]  
ACEVEDO Fernando, 2008, TOPOS DEBATE EDUCATI, V2, P12
[3]  
ACEVEDO Fernando, 2011, DICEN CALIDAD EDUCAT
[4]  
Acosta Ochoa Abril, 2015, Rev. educ. sup, V44, P169
[5]  
Aguerrondo I., 1993, Revista interamericana de desarrollo educativo, V37, P561
[6]   Higher education 'massification' and challenges to the professoriate: do academics' conceptions of quality matter? [J].
Akalu, Girmaw A. .
QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 22 (03) :260-276
[7]  
Alvarado Lagunas Elías, 2016, Rev. educ. sup, V45, P55
[8]   Challenges of implementing quality in European higher education: an expert perspective [J].
Alzafari, Khaled ;
Kratzer, Jan .
QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 25 (03) :261-288
[9]   Implementation of quality assurance standards in European higher education: does context matter? [J].
Alzafari, Khaled ;
Ursin, Jani .
QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 25 (01) :58-75
[10]  
Alzafari K, 2017, QUAL HIGH EDUC, V23, P264, DOI 10.1080/13538322.2017.1418607