Forecasting PM10 concentrations using time series models: a case of the most polluted cities in Turkey

被引:23
作者
Cekim, Hatice Oncel [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Stat, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Air pollution; ARIMA; Forecasting; PM10; Time series models; Trend; SINGULAR SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; AIR-QUALITY; ACCURACY; REGRESSION; EMISSIONS; DEMAND; ARIMA; CITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-08164-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Particulate matter (PM), which is one of the most important parameters in the area of air pollution, has widespread impacts on human health. Hence, the prediction of the probable concentration of PM is a highly significant subject with regard to primary warning for the protection of a population. Turkey is among the European countries with polluted air in terms of the concentration of PM with a diameter smaller than 10 mu m (PM10). The PM10 data supplies significant knowledge about how much pollution is in the air and which city is the most polluted. In this study, the values of PM10 for the most polluted cities in Turkey are forecasted using time series models, including autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), error, trend and seasonal (ETS), and singular spectrum analysis (SSA). Forecast values of PM10 averaging period of 24 h for the year 2019 are obtained using SSA as the optimum time series method. The results show that the annual means of PM10 concentrations in 2019 in Hatay and Yalova, the most polluted cities, will not exceed the 50 mu gm(- 3) value according to air quality standards determined by the European Commission. The air quality levels of eight other cities, which are Adana, Ankara, Icel, Istanbul, Kirklareli, Sakarya, Samsun, and Sivas, will reach acceptable standards between 50 and 70 mu gm(- 3) for annual mean in 2019. The remaining eight cities, Amasya, Bursa, Denizli, Kahramanmaras, Kutahya, Manisa, Nigde, and Tekirdag, continue to be the most polluted cities in 2019 according to the average annual PM10 values. This study also reveals that the average PM10 value of the most polluted cities in Turkey will be 68.97 mu gm(- 3) for the 24-h average in 2019.
引用
收藏
页码:25612 / 25624
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Performance Comparisons Between Arima and Arimax Method in Moslem Kids Clothes Demand Forecasting: Case Study
    Anggraeni, Wiwik
    Vinarti, Retno Aulia
    Kurniawati, Yuni Dwi
    [J]. THIRD INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2015, 2015, 72 : 630 - 637
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, AIR POLLUTION REPORT
  • [3] The tourism forecasting competition
    Athanasopoulos, George
    Hyndman, Rob J.
    Song, Haiyan
    Wu, Doris C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2011, 27 (03) : 822 - 844
  • [4] Correlation between air pollution and weather data in urban areas: Assessment of the city of Rome (Italy) as spatially and temporally independent regarding pollutants
    Battista, Gabriele
    Vollaro, Roberto de Lieto
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 165 : 240 - 247
  • [5] ANALYSING AND FORECASTING EUROPEAN UNION ENERGY DATA
    Beneki, Christina
    Silva, Emmanuel Sirimal
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY AND STATISTICS, 2013, 1 (02) : 127 - 141
  • [6] Box G. E., 1976, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control
  • [7] Bias correction in estimation of public health risk attributable to short-term air pollution exposure
    Burr, Wesley S.
    Takahara, Glen
    Shin, Hwashin H.
    [J]. ENVIRONMETRICS, 2015, 26 (04) : 298 - 311
  • [8] Generalized linear mixed models in time series studies of air pollution
    Chuang, Ya-Hsiu
    Mazumdar, Sati
    Park, Taeyoung
    Tang, Gong
    Arena, Vincent C.
    Nicolich, Mark J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2011, 2 (04) : 428 - 435
  • [9] Forecasting Time Series With Complex Seasonal Patterns Using Exponential Smoothing
    De Livera, Alysha M.
    Hyndman, Rob J.
    Snyder, Ralph D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 106 (496) : 1513 - 1527
  • [10] Mean Absolute Percentage Error for regression models
    de Myttenaere, Arnaud
    Golden, Boris
    Le Grand, Benedicte
    Rossi, Fabrice
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2016, 192 : 38 - 48