Online learning developments in undergraduate medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 69

被引:66
作者
Stojan, Jennifer [1 ]
Haas, Mary [1 ]
Thammasitboon, Satid [2 ,3 ]
Lander, Lina [4 ]
Evans, Sean [4 ]
Pawlik, Cameron [1 ]
Pawilkowska, Teresa [5 ]
Lew, Madelyn [1 ]
Khamees, Deena [6 ]
Peterson, William [1 ]
Hider, Ahmad [1 ]
Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran [7 ]
Uraiby, Hussein [7 ]
Gordon, Morris [8 ,9 ]
Daniel, Michelle [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Internal Med & Pediat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Texas Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Family Med & Publ Hlth, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[5] RCSI Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Univ Leicester, Sch Med, Leicester, Leics, England
[8] Blackpool Victoria Hosp, Blackpool, England
[9] Univ Cent Lancashire, Sch Med, Preston, Lancs, England
关键词
Best evidence medical education; remote learning; online learning; undergraduate medical education; COVID-19; QUALITY; STUDENTS; PATIENT; COMMUNICATION; RELIABILITY; CHALLENGES; TIMES;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2021.1992373
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background The COVID-19 pandemic spurred an abrupt transition away from in-person educational activities. This systematic review investigated the pivot to online learning for nonclinical undergraduate medical education (UGME) activities and explored descriptions of educational offerings deployed, their impact, and lessons learned. Methods The authors systematically searched four online databases and conducted a manual electronic search of MedEdPublish up to December 21, 2020. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts, performed data extraction and assessed risk of bias. A third author resolved discrepancies. Findings were reported in accordance with the STORIES (STructured apprOach to the Reporting in healthcare education of Evidence Synthesis) statement and BEME guidance. Results Fifty-six articles were included. The majority (n = 41) described the rapid transition of existing offerings to online formats, whereas fewer (n = 15) described novel activities. The majority (n = 27) included a combination of synchronous and asynchronous components. Didactics (n = 40) and small groups (n = 26) were the most common instructional methods. Teachers largely integrated technology to replace and amplify rather than transform learning, though learner engagement was often interactive. Thematic analysis revealed unique challenges of online learning, as well as exemplary practices. The quality of study designs and reporting was modest, with underpinning theory at highest risk of bias. Virtually all studies (n = 54) assessed reaction/satisfaction, fewer than half (n = 23) assessed changes in attitudes, knowledge or skills, and none assessed behavioral, organizational or patient outcomes. Conclusions UGME educators successfully transitioned face-to-face instructional methods online and implemented novel solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although technology's potential to transform teaching is not yet fully realized, the use of synchronous and asynchronous formats encouraged virtual engagement, while offering flexible, self-directed learning. As we transition from emergency remote learning to a post-pandemic world, educators must underpin new developments with theory, report additional outcomes and provide details that support replication.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 129
页数:21
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [11] Clarke V, 2013, PSYCHOLOGIST, V26, P120
  • [12] Clemmons K., 2020, MEDEDPUBLISH, V9, P165, DOI DOI 10.15694/MEP.2020.000165.1
  • [13] Distant surgical teaching during COVID-19 - A pilot study on final year medical students
    Co, Michael
    Chu, Kent-Man
    [J]. SURGICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 24 (03) : 105 - 109
  • [14] How COVID-19 Transformed Problem-Based Learning at Carle Illinois College of Medicine
    Coiado, Olivia C.
    Yodh, Jaya
    Galvez, Roberto
    Ahmad, Kashif
    [J]. MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR, 2020, 30 (04) : 1353 - 1354
  • [15] Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education
    Cook, David A.
    Bordage, Georges
    Schmidt, Henk G.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 42 (02) : 128 - 133
  • [16] A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: many informative elements missing
    Cook, David A.
    Beckman, Thomas J.
    Bordage, Georges
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (11) : 1074 - 1081
  • [17] Appraising the Quality of Medical Education Research Methods: The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education
    Cook, David A.
    Reed, Darcy A.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2015, 90 (08) : 1067 - 1076
  • [18] Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review
    Cook, David A.
    Levinson, Anthony J.
    Garside, Sarah
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 45 (03) : 227 - 238
  • [19] Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review
    Cook, Davin A.
    Beckman, Thomas J.
    Bordage, Georges
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (08) : 737 - 745
  • [20] Spotlight on the Shift to Remote Anatomical Teaching During Covid-19 Pandemic: Perspectives and Experiences from the University of Malta
    Cuschieri, Sarah
    Calleja Agius, Jean
    [J]. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2020, 13 (06) : 671 - 679