Deconstructing the symbol digit modalities test in multiple sclerosis: The role of memory

被引:26
|
作者
Patel, Viral P. [1 ]
Walker, Lisa A. S. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Feinstein, Anthony [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Psychiat, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Brain & Mind Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Carleton Univ, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Neuropsychology; Processing speed; SDMT; Memory; ORAL-RESPONSE; SPEED; PERFORMANCE; SCALE; TASK; IMPAIRMENT; DEFICITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.msard.2017.08.006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a sensitive measure of impaired cognition in people with MS. While the SDMT is primarily considered a test of information processing speed, other components such as visual scanning and oral-motor ability have also been linked to performance. The objective of this study was to determine the role of memory in the performance of the SDMT. Methods: Two version of a modified computerized SDMT (c-SDMT) were employed, a fixed and a variable. For each group 50 MS and 33 healthy control (HC) participants were recruited. In the fixed c-SDMT, the symbol-digit code is kept constant for the entire test whereas in the variable version, it changes eight times. Unlike the traditional SDMT which records the correct number of responses, the c-SDMT presented here measures the mean response time (in seconds) for the eight trials. Results: MS participants were slower than HC on the fixed (p < 0.001) and variable (p = 0.005) c-SDMT. Trend analysis showed performance improvement on the fixed, but not on the variable c-SDMT in both MS and HC groups. Furthermore, immediate visual memory recall was associated with the fixed (13 = 0.299, p = 0.017), but not variable (B = 0.057, p = 0.260) c-SDMT. Immediate verbal memory was not associated with either versions of the c-SDMT. Conclusions: Given that the fixed and variable c-SDMTs are identical in every way apart from the fixity of the code, the ability of participants to speed up responses over the course of the fixed version only points to the contribution of incidental visual memory in test performance.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 189
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Baseline predictors of cross-sectional and longitudinal performance on the symbol digit modalities test in individuals with multiple sclerosis
    Gopalakrishnan, Niveditha
    Cadden, Margaret
    Barker, Lindsay
    Healy, Brian C.
    Chitnis, Tanuja
    Weiner, Howard L.
    Glanz, Bonnie I.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2025, 469
  • [22] Practice effect in Symbol Digit Modalities Test in multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab
    Roar, Malte
    Illes, Zsolt
    Sejbaek, Tobias
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2016, 10 : 116 - 122
  • [23] Symbol digit modalities test predicts decline of off-road driving ability in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis
    Maeta, Manami
    Mizuno, Masanori
    Okubo, Satoru
    Ogasawara, Miku
    Terauchi, Takahiro
    Suzuki, Masako
    Akasaka, Hiroshi
    Sato, Yoshitomo
    Ohi, Kiyohumi
    Maeda, Tetsuya
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2022, 68
  • [24] In-person and remote administrations of the symbol digit modalities test are interchangeable among persons with multiple sclerosis
    Levy, Sarah
    Dvorak, Emily M.
    Graney, Robin
    Staker, Erin
    Sumowski, James F.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2023, 71
  • [25] Development and validation of an electronic Symbol-Digit Modalities Test for remote monitoring of people with multiple sclerosis
    Dini, Michelangelo
    Gamberini, Giulia
    Tacchini, Marta
    Boschetti, Angela
    Gradassi, Alessandro
    Chiveri, Luca
    Rodegher, Mariaemma
    Comi, Giancarlo
    Leocani, Letizia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2024,
  • [26] Psychometrics and normative data for the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite: replacing the PASAT with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test
    Drake, A. S.
    Weinstock-Guttman, B.
    Morrow, S. A.
    Hojnacki, D.
    Munschauer, F. E.
    Benedict, R. H. B.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (02) : 228 - 237
  • [27] Visual and motor confounds on the symbol digit modalities test
    Chen, Michelle H.
    Chiaravalloti, Nancy D.
    Genova, Helen M.
    Costa, Silvana L.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2020, 45
  • [28] A Rapid Electronic Cognitive Assessment Measure for Multiple Sclerosis: Validation of Cognitive Reaction, an Electronic Version of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test
    Middleton, Rod M.
    Pearson, Owen R.
    Ingram, Gillian
    Craig, Elaine M.
    Rodgers, William J.
    Downing-Wood, Hannah
    Hill, Joseph
    Tuite-Dalton, Katherine
    Roberts, Christopher
    Watson, Lynne
    Ford, David, V
    Nicholas, Richard
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (09)
  • [29] Regression-Based Norms for the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in the Dutch Population: Improving Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis?
    Burggraaff, Jessica
    Knol, Dirk L.
    Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J.
    EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2017, 77 (5-6) : 246 - 252
  • [30] Brain volumetric correlates of remotely versus in-person administered symbol digit modalities test in multiple sclerosis
    Buyukturkoglu, Korhan
    Dworkin, Jordan D.
    Leiva, Victor
    Provenzano, Frank A.
    Guevara, Pamela
    De Jager, Philip L.
    Leavitt, Victoria M.
    Riley, Claire S.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2022, 68