Deconstructing the symbol digit modalities test in multiple sclerosis: The role of memory

被引:26
|
作者
Patel, Viral P. [1 ]
Walker, Lisa A. S. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Feinstein, Anthony [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Psychiat, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Brain & Mind Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Carleton Univ, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Neuropsychology; Processing speed; SDMT; Memory; ORAL-RESPONSE; SPEED; PERFORMANCE; SCALE; TASK; IMPAIRMENT; DEFICITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.msard.2017.08.006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a sensitive measure of impaired cognition in people with MS. While the SDMT is primarily considered a test of information processing speed, other components such as visual scanning and oral-motor ability have also been linked to performance. The objective of this study was to determine the role of memory in the performance of the SDMT. Methods: Two version of a modified computerized SDMT (c-SDMT) were employed, a fixed and a variable. For each group 50 MS and 33 healthy control (HC) participants were recruited. In the fixed c-SDMT, the symbol-digit code is kept constant for the entire test whereas in the variable version, it changes eight times. Unlike the traditional SDMT which records the correct number of responses, the c-SDMT presented here measures the mean response time (in seconds) for the eight trials. Results: MS participants were slower than HC on the fixed (p < 0.001) and variable (p = 0.005) c-SDMT. Trend analysis showed performance improvement on the fixed, but not on the variable c-SDMT in both MS and HC groups. Furthermore, immediate visual memory recall was associated with the fixed (13 = 0.299, p = 0.017), but not variable (B = 0.057, p = 0.260) c-SDMT. Immediate verbal memory was not associated with either versions of the c-SDMT. Conclusions: Given that the fixed and variable c-SDMTs are identical in every way apart from the fixity of the code, the ability of participants to speed up responses over the course of the fixed version only points to the contribution of incidental visual memory in test performance.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 189
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite and Symbol Digit Modalities Test as outcome measures in pediatric multiple sclerosis
    Brenton, J. Nicholas
    Koshiya, Hitoshi
    Woolbright, Emma
    Goldman, Myla D.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL-EXPERIMENTAL TRANSLATIONAL AND CLINICAL, 2019, 5 (02)
  • [12] Correlation of the symbol digit modalities test with the quality of life and depression in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis
    Niino, Masaaki
    Fukumoto, Shoko
    Okuno, Tatsusada
    Sanjo, Nobuo
    Fukaura, Hikoaki
    Mori, Masahiro
    Ohashi, Takashi
    Takeuchi, Hideyuki
    Shimizu, Yuko
    Fujimori, Juichi
    Kawachi, Izumi
    Kira, Jun-ichi
    Takahashi, Eri
    Miyazaki, Yusei
    Mifune, Nobuhiro
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2022, 57
  • [13] Validity of a computerized version of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in multiple sclerosis
    Nadine Akbar
    Kimia Honarmand
    Nancy Kou
    Anthony Feinstein
    Journal of Neurology, 2011, 258 : 373 - 379
  • [14] Procedural Variations in the Stroop and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test: Impact on Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
    Hughes, Abbey J.
    Denney, Douglas R.
    Owens, Emily M.
    Lynch, Sharon G.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 28 (05) : 452 - 462
  • [15] Eye and hand motor interactions with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in early multiple sclerosis
    Nygaard, Gro O.
    Benavent, Sigrid A. de Rodez
    Harbo, Hanne F.
    Laeng, Bruno
    Sowa, Piotr
    Damangir, Soheil
    Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard
    Etholm, Lars
    Tonnesen, Siren
    Kerty, Emilia
    Drolsum, Liv
    Landro, Nils Inge
    Celius, Elisabeth G.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2015, 4 (06) : 585 - 589
  • [16] Is the Symbol Digit Modalities Test a useful outcome in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis?
    Koch, Marcus W.
    Mostert, Jop
    Repovic, Pavle
    Bowen, James D.
    Uitdehaag, Bernard
    Cutter, Gary
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 28 (06) : 2115 - 2120
  • [17] Symbol Digit Modalities Test Variant in a Smartphone App for Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: Validation Study
    van Oirschot, Pim
    Heerings, Marco
    Wendrich, Karine
    den Teuling, Bram
    Martens, Marijn B.
    Jongen, Peter J.
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2020, 8 (10):
  • [18] Interpreting change on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in people with relapsing multiple sclerosis using the reliable change methodology
    Weinstock, Zachary
    Morrow, Sarah
    Conway, Devon
    Fuchs, Tom
    Wojcik, Curtis
    Unverdi, Mahmut
    Zivadinov, Robert
    Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca
    Iverson, Grant L.
    Dwyer, Michael
    Benedict, Ralph H. B.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2022, 28 (07) : 1101 - 1111
  • [19] Remote administration of the symbol digit modalities test to individuals with multiple sclerosis is reliable: A short report
    Eilam-Stock, Tehila
    Shaw, Michael T.
    Sherman, Kathleen
    Krupp, Lauren B.
    Charvet, Leigh E.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL-EXPERIMENTAL TRANSLATIONAL AND CLINICAL, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [20] Symbol Digit Modalities Test: A valid clinical trial endpoint for measuring cognition in multiple sclerosis
    Strober, Lauren
    DeLuca, John
    Benedict, Ralph H. B.
    Jacobs, Adam
    Cohen, Jeffrey A.
    Chiaravalloti, Nancy
    Hudson, Lynn D.
    Rudick, Richard A.
    LaRocca, Nicholas G.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (13) : 1781 - 1790