Providers' knowledge of, attitude to and practice of emergency contraception

被引:26
作者
Uzuner, A [1 ]
Ünalan, P [1 ]
Akman, M [1 ]
Çifçili, S [1 ]
Tuncer, I [1 ]
Çoban, E [1 ]
Yikilkan, H [1 ]
Akgün, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maramara, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
emergency contraception; knowledge; hormonal contraceptives; provider; prejudice;
D O I
10.1080/13625180500035025
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives Barriers to widespread use of hormonal emergency contraceptives (EC), such as lack of knowledge and prejudices held by health-care providers, still exist today. This study was initiated to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and prejudices of family-planning (FP) providers. Methods This survey was conducted in FP units of primary-health-care centers in Istanbul. A total of 180 providers were interviewed in 80 units to whom a questionnaire was administered by face-to-face technique. Results One-hundred and fifty-two of the providers stated that they had heard of EC. The correct timing and dose interval of EC were known by 50% of them. The participants held the belief that EC caused abortion (39.4%), and that it was harmful for the fetus (31.1%). Other prejudices were the possibility of increased unprotected sexual intercourse (78.9%) and a tendency for men to give up condom use (75%); female providers were more prejudiced concerning these statements. The providers' tendency towards the provision of counseling was significantly related to their prejudices (p = 0.01, 1, p = 0.033) and to the application rate (P = 0.000). Conclusion Providers need more detailed information about EC. During FP training courses, the providers should be encouraged towards counseling EC which would increase the application rate of the users and decrease their own prejudices.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Changes in providers' views and practices about emergency contraception with education
    Beckman, LJ
    Harvey, SM
    Sherman, CA
    Petitti, DB
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (06) : 942 - 946
  • [2] Intrauterine devices
    Bilian, X
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02) : 155 - 168
  • [3] Little knowledge and limited practice: Emergency contraceptive pills, the public, and the obstetrician-gynecologist
    Delbanco, SF
    Mauldon, J
    Smith, MD
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (06) : 1006 - 1011
  • [4] Emergency contraception: Randomized comparison of advance provision and information only
    Ellertson, C
    Ambardekar, S
    Hedley, A
    Coyaji, K
    Trussell, J
    Blanchard, K
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (04) : 570 - 575
  • [5] Young women's accounts of factors influencing their use and non-use of emergency contraception: in-depth interview study
    Free, C
    Lee, RM
    Ogden, J
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7377): : 1393 - 1396
  • [6] Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding emergency contraception among nurses and nursing students in two hospitals in Nairobi, Kenya
    Gichangi, PB
    Karanja, JG
    Kigondu, CS
    Fonck, K
    Temmerman, M
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 1999, 59 (04) : 253 - 256
  • [7] The effects of self-administering emergency contraception
    Glasier, A
    Baird, D
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [8] Advanced provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion rates
    Glasier, A
    Fairhurst, K
    Wyke, S
    Ziebland, S
    Seaman, P
    Walker, J
    Lakha, F
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 69 (05) : 361 - 366
  • [9] Emergency contraception
    Glasier, A
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02): : 181 - 191
  • [10] Drug therapy - Emergency postcoital contraception
    Glasier, A
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (15) : 1058 - 1064