Are Technological Developments Improving the Environmental Sustainability of Photovoltaic Electricity?

被引:15
作者
Blanco, Carlos Felipe [1 ]
Cucurachi, Stefano [1 ]
Peijnenburg, Willie J. G. M. [2 ]
Beames, Alistair [3 ]
Vijver, Martina G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Environm Sci CML, POB 9518, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Lab Ecol Risk Assessment, POB 1, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Operat Res & Logist Chair Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
environmental impacts; life-cycle assessments; photovoltaics; solar; sustainability; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1002/ente.201901064
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Innovation in photovoltaics (PV) is mostly driven by the cost per kilowatt ratio, making it easy to overlook environmental impacts of technological enhancements during early research and development stages. As PV technology developers introduce novel materials and manufacturing methods, the well-studied environmental profile of conventional silicon-based PV may change considerably. Herein, existing trends and hotspots across different types of emerging PV technologies are investigated through a systematic review and meta-analysis of life-cycle assessments (LCAs). To incorporate as many data points as possible, a comprehensive harmonization procedure is applied, producing over 600 impact data points for organic, perovskite (PK), dye-sensitized, tandem, silicon, and other thin-film cells. How the panel and balance of system components affect environmental footprints in comparable installations is also investigated and discussed. Despite the large uncertainties and variabilities in the underlying LCA data and models, the harmonized results show clear positive trends across the sector. Seven potential hotspots are identified for specific PV technologies and impact categories. The analysis offers a high-level guidance for technology developers to avoid introducing undesired environmental trade-offs as they advance to make PV more competitive in the energy markets.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, U NI F E WORLD RAIL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaic (ITRPV) 2019 Results
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT ENCY SOCIAL BEHA
[4]  
[Anonymous], Web of Science
[5]   Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: Review and results harmonization [J].
Asdrubali, Francesco ;
Baldinelli, Giorgio ;
D'Alessandro, Francesco ;
Scrucca, Flavio .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 :1113-1122
[6]   Cost-Performance Analysis of Perovskite Solar Modules [J].
Cai, Molang ;
Wu, Yongzhen ;
Chen, Han ;
Yang, Xudong ;
Qiang, Yinghuai ;
Han, Liyuan .
ADVANCED SCIENCE, 2017, 4 (01)
[7]   Ecodesign perspectives of thin-film photovoltaic technologies: A review of life cycle assessment studies [J].
Chatzisideris, Marios D. ;
Espinosa, Nieves ;
Laurent, Alexis ;
Krebs, Frederik C. .
SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2016, 156 :2-10
[8]  
Collingridge D., 1980, SOCIAL CONTROL TECHN
[9]   Ex-ante LCA of emerging technologies [J].
Cucurachi, Stefano ;
van der Giesena, Coen ;
Guinee, Jeroen .
25TH CIRP LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE) CONFERENCE, 2018, 69 :463-468
[10]  
European Commission Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European context-Based on Existing Environmental Impact Assessment Models and Factors ILCD, 2011, ILCD Handbook: Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European context, DOI [DOI 10.2788/33030, 10.2788/33030]