Comparing Outcomes of Wise-Pattern, Two-Stage Breast Reduction-Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix

被引:5
|
作者
Patel, Ashraf A.
Kayaleh, Hana
Sala, Luke A.
Peterson, Dylan J.
Upadhyaya, Prashant K. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Dept Surg, 750 East Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
关键词
AESTHETIC OUTCOMES; CAPSULE FORMATION; IMPLANTS; OBESITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000008298
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Aesthetic results in breast reconstruction for ptotic/obese breasts may be improved when using Wise-pattern closures compared with nipple-sparing mastectomies. In two-stage reconstruction, acellular dermal matrix is commonly used to support the prosthesis. This study tests the efficacy of an alternate technique that uses deepithelialized excess breast skin in lieu of acellular dermal matrix. To better understand whether acellular dermal matrix is necessary, the authors compared postoperative outcomes from reduction-reconstructions that used matrix to those that did not. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of patients who underwent staged breast reconstruction following Wise-pattern closures between September of 2016 and October of 2019. Two cohorts were created based on whether acellular dermal matrix was used. Charts were reviewed for incidence of postoperative complications. Results: A total of 164 breasts were reconstructed in 85 female patients. The acellular dermal matrix cohort consisted of 68 breasts, whereas the non-acellular dermal matrix cohort included 96 breasts. After the first stage, the incidence of one or more complications was similar between cohorts (acellular dermal matrix, 32.4 percent; nonmatrix, 35.4 percent; p = 0.684). Minor infection rates were significantly higher in reconstructions using acellular dermal matrix (16.2 percent versus 6.3 percent; p = 0.040). After the second stage, the complication incidence was also similar between cohorts (acellular dermal matrix, 16.2 percent; nonmatrix, 13.5 percent; p = 0.638). Final follow-up time was 445.2 days. Conclusions: Overall complication rates following both stages of reconstruction were similar with and without acellular dermal matrix. When acellular dermal matrix was used, minor infection rates were higher following expander placement. In patients desiring a reduction-reconstruction, the authors find the deepithelialized dermal flap provides ample prosthesis support, without the need for acellular dermal matrix.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 521
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acellular dermal matrix reduces capsule formation in two-stage breast reconstruction
    Chopra, Karan
    Buckingham, Bryan
    Matthews, Jamil
    Sabino, Jennifer
    Tadisina, Kashyap K.
    Silverman, Ronald P.
    Goldberg, Nelson H.
    Slezak, Sheri
    Singh, Devinder P.
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (02) : 414 - 419
  • [2] Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Expander and Acellular Dermal Matrix: Why and When
    Baccarani, Alessio
    Blessent, Claudio Gio Francesco
    Marra, Caterina
    De Maria, Federico
    Pappalardo, Marco
    De Santis, Giorgio
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (04)
  • [3] The Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Two-Stage Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction
    Weichman, Katie E.
    Wilson, Stelios C.
    Weinstein, Andrew L.
    Hazen, Alexes
    Levine, Jamie P.
    Choi, Mihye
    Karp, Nolan S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (05) : 1049 - 1058
  • [4] An Algorithmic Approach for Selective Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Immediate Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction: Indications and Outcomes
    Jordan, Sumanas W.
    Khavanin, Nima
    Fine, Neil A.
    Kim, John Y. S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (02) : 178 - 188
  • [5] Impact and Outcome of Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Size for Immediate and Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction
    Cayci, Cenk
    Santner, Florian
    Jacobson, Steven R.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [6] Discussion: The Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Two-Stage Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction
    Butler, Charles E.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (05) : 1059 - 1060
  • [7] Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study
    Marquez, Jessica L.
    French, Mackenzie
    Ormiston, Laurel
    Pires, Giovanna
    Martheswaran, Tanisha
    Eddington, Devin
    Tuncer, Fatma
    Agarwal, Jayant P.
    Kwok, Alvin C.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2024, 89 : 97 - 104
  • [8] Discussion: An Algorithmic Approach for Selective Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Immediate Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction: Indications and Outcomes
    Hanasono, Matthew M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (02) : 189 - 190
  • [9] Two-stage expander/implant breast reconstruction versus prepectoral breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: a cost analysis
    Innocenti, Alessandro
    Melita, Dario
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 45 (04) : 601 - 615
  • [10] Two-stage expander/implant breast reconstruction versus prepectoral breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: a cost analysis
    Alessandro Innocenti
    Dario Melita
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2022, 45 : 601 - 615