Health Literacy and Communication Quality in Health Care Organizations

被引:114
作者
Wynia, Matthew K. [1 ]
Osborn, Chandra Y. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Med Assoc, Inst Eth, Chicago, IL 60654 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Publ Hlth, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Diabet Res & Training Ctr, Vanderbilt Eskind Diabet Ctr, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
关键词
IDENTIFY PATIENTS; CULTURE; RISK; EXPECTATIONS; VALIDATION; QUESTIONS; BEHAVIOR; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1080/10810730.2010.499981
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The relationship between limited health literacy and poor health may be due, in part, to poor communication quality within health care delivery organizations. We explored the relationship between health literacy status and receiving patient-centered communication in clinics and hospitals serving communication-vulnerable patient populations. Thirteen health care organizations nationwide distributed a survey to 5929 patients. All patients completed seven items assessing patient-centered communication. One third also completed three items assessing health literacy. The majority of patients had self-reported health literacy challenges, reporting problems learning about their medical condition because of difficulty understanding written information (53%), a lack of confidence in completing medical forms by themselves (61%), and needing someone to help them read hospital/clinic materials (57%). Logistic regression models showed that, after adjustment for patient demographic characteristics and health care organization type, patients with limited health literacy were 28% to 79% less likely than those with adequate health literacy to report their health care organization oalwayso provides patient-centered communication across seven communication items. Using a scaled composite of these items, limited health literacy remained associated with lower reported communication quality. These results suggest that improving communication quality in health care organizations might help to address the challenges facing patients with limited health literacy. They also highlight that efforts to address the needs of patients with limited health literacy should be sensitive to the range of communication challenges confronting these patients and their caregivers.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 115
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] Turner Teri, 2009, Pediatrics, V124 Suppl 3, pS299, DOI 10.1542/peds.2009-1162F
  • [32] Behavior and analysis of 36-item short-form health survey data for surgical quality-of-life research
    Velanovich, Vic
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2007, 142 (05) : 473 - 477
  • [33] Villaire M, 2007, PROF CASE MANAG, V12, P213
  • [34] Can screening items identify surgery patients at risk of limited health literacy?
    Wallace, Lorraine S.
    Cassada, David C.
    Rogers, Edwin S.
    Freeman, Michael B.
    Grandas, Oscar H.
    Stevens, Scott L.
    Goldman, Mitchell H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 140 (02) : 208 - 213
  • [35] BRIEF REPORT: Screening items to identify patients with limited health literacy skills
    Wallace, Lorraine S.
    Rogers, Edwin S.
    Roskos, Steven E.
    Holiday, David B.
    Weiss, Barry D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 21 (08) : 874 - 877
  • [36] Weiss BD, 1998, J FAM PRACTICE, V46, P168
  • [37] Health literacy and functional health status among older adults
    Wolf, MS
    Gazmararian, JA
    Baker, DW
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (17) : 1946 - 1952
  • [38] Wynia M., 2006, PROMISING PRACTICES
  • [39] Improving fairness in coverage decisions: Performance expectations for quality improvement
    Wynia, MK
    Cummins, D
    Fleming, D
    Karsjens, K
    Orr, A
    Sabin, J
    Saphire-Bernstein, I
    Witlen, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2004, 4 (03) : 87 - 100
  • [40] Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care informationReport of a national consensus process
    Matthew K. Wynia
    Steven S. Coughlin
    Sheri Alpert
    Deborah S. Cummins
    Linda L. Emanuel
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2001, 16 (2) : 100 - 111