Economic Competitiveness Evaluation of the Energy Sources: Comparison between a Financial Model and Levelized Cost of Electricity Analysis

被引:19
作者
Sung, Sanghyun [1 ]
Jung, Wooyong [1 ]
机构
[1] KEPCO Int Nucl Grad Sch KINGS, Dept NPP Engn, 658-91 Haemaji Ro, Ulsan 45014, South Korea
关键词
energy business; energy source; project finance; financial model; levelized cost of electricity; internal rate of return; tariff growth rate; loan period; sensitivity analysis; GRID PARITY; SOLAR POWER; WIND POWER; LCOE; TECHNOLOGIES; CHINA;
D O I
10.3390/en12214101
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) is used widely to compare the economic competitiveness of the energy mix. This method is easy to understand and simple to apply, which makes it preferable for many energy policymakers. However, the method has several disadvantages from the energy business perspective. First, the LCOE approach does not consider revenue, and a high-interest rate usually correlates with the tariff growth rate. Thus, if a high-interest rate increases the cost, that high rate increases the revenue, which can affect economic competitiveness. Second, the LCOE does not consider different stakeholders. Equity investors and loan investors have different interests depending on different financial indicators, which influence the same energy sources' differential economic attractiveness. This study analyzes and compares the LCOE, Project Internal Rate of Return (Project IRR), Equity Internal Rate of Return (Equity IRR), and Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) of an illustrative wind, coal, and nuclear power project using Monte-Carlo simulations. The results show that energy sources' economic competitiveness can vary depending on financial indicators. This study will help energy policymakers develop more economically realistic energy portfolios.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Levelised cost of energy - A theoretical justification and critical assessment
    Aldersey-Williams, J.
    Rubert, T.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 124 : 169 - 179
  • [2] Better estimates of LCOE from audited accounts - A new methodology with examples from United Kingdom offshore wind and CCGT
    Aldersey-Williams, John
    Broadbent, Ian D.
    Strachan, Peter A.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 128 : 25 - 35
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, AV OP HEAT RAT SEL E
  • [4] [Anonymous], REC AV COST QUAL FOS
  • [5] Benes Keith J., 2016, Electricity Journal, V29, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.tej.2016.09.013
  • [6] Electricity grid tariffs as a tool for flexible energy systems: A Danish case study
    Bergaentzle, Claire
    Jensen, Ida Graested
    Skytte, Klaus
    Olsen, Ole Jess
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 126 : 12 - 21
  • [7] An overview of renewable electric power capacity and progress in new technologies in the world
    Bilgili, Mehmet
    Ozbek, Arif
    Sahin, Besir
    Kahraman, Ali
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 49 : 323 - 334
  • [8] A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity
    Branker, K.
    Pathak, M. J. M.
    Pearce, J. M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (09) : 4470 - 4482
  • [9] Brealey R A., 2006, Corporate Finance, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.02.063
  • [10] Global overview on grid-parity
    Breyer, Christian
    Gerlach, Alexander
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2013, 21 (01): : 121 - 136