Loss Aversion and Health Behaviors: Results from Two Incentivized Economic Experiments

被引:1
作者
Bessey, Donata [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, East Asia Int Coll, Wonju 26493, South Korea
关键词
health behaviors; loss aversion; Big Five; personality traits; college students; PROSPECT-THEORY; RISK; PERSONALITY; DOMAIN;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare9081040
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Experimental research in health economics has analyzed the effects of economic preference parameters such as risk attitude and time preference on the probability of adopting risky health behaviors. However, the existing evidence is mixed and previous research often fails to include controls for other determinants of health behaviors such as personality traits. The aim of this research is to analyze the relationships between an incentivized measure of loss aversion and three health behaviors: smoking, binge drinking, and engaging in physical activity. Loss aversion is a preference measure that has been derived from prospect theory as an alternative approach to analyze decision-making under risk, such as the decision to invest in health capital, and has never been used in an analysis of the determinants of health behaviors before. Using two experimental samples of college students in the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, and controlling for Big Five personality traits and a host of individual-level control variables, there are no statistically significant relationships between loss aversion and the three aforementioned health behaviors, but relationships for Big Five conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. A candidate explanation might be lack of domain independence for loss aversion. Differences between the Korean and the US samples indicate the possibility of intercultural differences.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]   Behavioral operations: The state of the field [J].
Croson, R. ;
Schultz, K. ;
Siemsen, E. ;
Yeo, M. L. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (1-2) :1-5
[12]   On the Validity of the Random Lottery Incentive System [J].
Robin P. Cubitt ;
Chris Starmer ;
Robert Sugden .
Experimental Economics, 1998, 1 (2) :115-131
[13]   Do workers work more if wages are high? Evidence from a randomized field experiment [J].
Fehr, Ernst ;
Goette, Lorenz .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 97 (01) :298-317
[14]   Personality, Well-Being, and Health [J].
Friedman, Howard S. ;
Kern, Margaret L. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 65, 2014, 65 :719-742
[15]  
Fryar CD., 2012, PREVALENCE OVERWEIGH
[16]  
Gachter S., 2007, 2961 IZA
[17]  
Gerlitz J. Y., 2005, DIW Res. Notes, V4, P2005
[18]   OPTIMAL INCENTIVE CONTRACTS IN THE PRESENCE OF CAREER CONCERNS - THEORY AND EVIDENCE [J].
GIBBONS, R ;
MURPHY, KJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (03) :468-505
[19]   Put Your Money Where Your Butt Is: A Commitment Contract for Smoking Cessation [J].
Gine, Xavier ;
Karlan, Dean ;
Zinman, Jonathan .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2010, 2 (04) :213-235
[20]   Measuring trust [J].
Glaeser, EL ;
Laibson, DI ;
Scheinkman, JA ;
Soutter, CL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 115 (03) :811-846