Population-based cancer survival in the United States: Data, quality control, and statistical methods

被引:26
作者
Allemani, Claudia [1 ]
Harewood, Rhea [1 ]
Johnson, Christopher J. [2 ]
Carreira, Helena [1 ]
Spika, Devon [1 ]
Bonaventure, Audrey [1 ]
Ward, Kevin [3 ]
Weir, Hannah K. [4 ]
Coleman, Michel P. [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Noncommunicable Dis Epidemiol, Canc Survival Grp, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, England
[2] Canc Data Registry Idaho, Boise, ID USA
[3] Emory Univ, Georgia Ctr Canc Stat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Canc Prevent & Control, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
cancer; National Program for Cancer Registries (NPCR); population-based survival; statistical methods; Surveillance; Epidemiology; and End Results (SEER); STAGE; 2001-2009; FINDINGS; GLOBAL SURVEILLANCE; REGISTRY DATA; FUNNEL PLOTS; LIFE-TABLES; RACE; DISPARITIES; IMPACT; AGE;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.31025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDRobust comparisons of population-based cancer survival estimates require tight adherence to the study protocol, standardized quality control, appropriate life tables of background mortality, and centralized analysis. The CONCORD program established worldwide surveillance of population-based cancer survival in 2015, analyzing individual data on 26 million patients (including 10 million US patients) diagnosed between 1995 and 2009 with 1 of 10 common malignancies. METHODSIn this Cancer supplement, we analyzed data from 37 state cancer registries that participated in the second cycle of the CONCORD program (CONCORD-2), covering approximately 80% of the US population. Data quality checks were performed in 3 consecutive phases: protocol adherence, exclusions, and editorial checks. One-, 3-, and 5-year age-standardized net survival was estimated using the Pohar Perme estimator and state- and race-specific life tables of all-cause mortality for each year. The cohort approach was adopted for patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2003, and the complete approach for patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2009. RESULTSArticles in this supplement report population coverage, data quality indicators, and age-standardized 5-year net survival by state, race, and stage at diagnosis. Examples of tables, bar charts, and funnel plots are provided in this article. CONCLUSIONSPopulation-based cancer survival is a key measure of the overall effectiveness of services in providing equitable health care. The high quality of US cancer registry data, 80% population coverage, and use of an unbiased net survival estimator ensure that the survival trends reported in this supplement are robustly comparable by race and state. The results can be used by policymakers to identify and address inequities in cancer survival in each state and for the United States nationally. Cancer 2017;123:4982-93. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Population-based cancer survival is a key measure of the overall effectiveness of health systems in managing the cancer burden. The high quality of US cancer registry data, 80% population coverage in the CONCORD-2 study, and the use of an unbiased estimator of net survival ensure that the survival trends reported in this supplement are robustly comparable by race and state. These results can be used to plan and evaluate the cancer control strategy in each state and for the United States nationally.
引用
收藏
页码:4982 / 4993
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2) [J].
Allemani, Claudia ;
Weir, Hannah K. ;
Carreira, Helena ;
Harewood, Rhea ;
Spika, Devon ;
Wang, Xiao-Si ;
Bannon, Finian ;
Ahn, Jane V. ;
Johnson, Christopher J. ;
Bonaventure, Audrey ;
Marcos-Gragera, Rafael ;
Stiller, Charles ;
Azevedo e Silva, Gulnar ;
Chen, Wan-Qing ;
Ogunbiyi, Olufemi J. ;
Rachet, Bernard ;
Soeberg, Matthew J. ;
You, Hui ;
Matsuda, Tomohiro ;
Bielska-Lasota, Magdalena ;
Storm, Hans ;
Tucker, Thomas C. ;
Coleman, Michel P. .
LANCET, 2015, 385 (9972) :977-1010
[2]   Cervical cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study [J].
Benard, Vicki B. ;
Watson, Meg ;
Saraiya, Mona ;
Harewood, Rhea ;
Townsend, Julie S. ;
Stroup, Antoinette M. ;
Weir, Hannah K. ;
Allemani, Claudia .
CANCER, 2017, 123 :5119-5137
[3]  
Brenner H, 1996, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V78, P2004, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961101)78:9<2004::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-#
[5]   Net survival estimation with stns [J].
Clerc-Urmes, Isabelle ;
Grzebyk, Michel ;
Hedelin, Guy .
STATA JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (01) :87-102
[6]   Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD) [J].
Coleman, Michel P. ;
Quaresma, Manuela ;
Berrino, Franco ;
Lutz, Jean-Michel ;
De Angelis, Roberto ;
Capocaccia, Riccardo ;
Baili, Paolo ;
Rachet, Bernard ;
Gatta, Gemma ;
Hakulinen, Timo ;
Micheli, Andrea ;
Sant, Milena ;
Weir, Hannah K. ;
Elwood, J. Mark ;
Tsukuma, Hideaki ;
Koifman, Sergio ;
Azevedo e Silva, Gulnar ;
Francisci, Silvia ;
Santaquilani, Mariano ;
Verdecchia, Arduino ;
Storm, Hans H. ;
Young, John L. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2008, 9 (08) :730-756
[7]   Cancer survival: global surveillance will stimulate health policy and improve equity [J].
Coleman, Michel P. .
LANCET, 2014, 383 (9916) :564-573
[8]   Standard cancer patient population for age standardising survival ratios [J].
Corazziari, I ;
Quinn, M ;
Capocaccia, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (15) :2307-2316
[9]   Collaborative Staging and Its Impact on Cancer Registry Data: Information for Data Users on Analysis and Interpretation of Registry Data Preface [J].
Cronin, Kathleen A. ;
Ries, Lynn A. G. ;
Edwards, Brenda K. .
CANCER, 2014, 120 (23) :3755-3757
[10]  
CUTLER S J, 1958, J Chronic Dis, V8, P699, DOI 10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7