Validation and reliability of the Emotional Development Questionnaire in Adults (CDE-A35)

被引:5
作者
Perez-Escoda, Nuria [1 ]
Alegre Rossello, Albert [2 ]
Lopez-Cassa, Elia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[2] East Stroudsburg Univ, East Stroudsburg, PA USA
来源
EDUCATIO SIGLO XXI | 2021年 / 39卷 / 03期
关键词
Questionnaires; emotional development; emotion; reliability; validity; BIG; 5; INTELLIGENCE; LIFE; SATISFACTION; INVENTORY; SAMPLE; MODEL;
D O I
10.6018/educatio.422081
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article presents the validation of an instrument for the measurement of trait emotional intelligence. More specifically, the instrument validated is the CDE-A35, an adult emotional development questionnaire elaborated from the pentagonal model of emotional competence. Various studies have been carried out to demonstrate the reliability and validity of the instrument. These include the calculation of the questionnaire's internal consistency coefficient, factor studies (AFC and AFE), correlation studies with other measures of emotional intelligence, social skills and personality, and a regression study. The present validation suggested the suppression and relocation of some elements, leading to a definitive instrument consisting of 35 items organized within five factors: emotional awareness, regulation, social skills, emotional autonomy and life and well-being skills. These five factors coincide with the dimensions of emotional competence in the theoretical model. The remarkable correlations with other emotional intelligence tests (TEIque and CTI), as well as with the dimensions of the personality test NEO-FFI and with the Inventory of Social Skills (EHS), confirmed its convergent validity. Furthermore, the regression analysis performed confirmed the incremental validity of the CDE-A35 over other tests already established. The CDE-A35 is a sound theoretically-based questionnaire with rigorous psychometric characteristics, and is therefore considered optimal for evaluating trait emotional intelligence in adults.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 60
页数:24
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]   Self-Report Assessments of Emotional Competencies: A Critical Look at Methods and Meanings [J].
Keefer, Kateryna V. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2015, 33 (01) :3-23
[22]  
Keefer KV, 2018, SPRINGER SER HUM EXC, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-90633-1
[23]  
Kline R. B., 2015, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
[24]  
Kotsou I, 2019, INTELLIGENCE EMOTION
[25]  
Little T. D., 2013, Longitudinal structural equation modeling
[26]   Why the Items Versus Parcels Controversy Needn't Be One [J].
Little, Todd D. ;
Rhemtulla, Mijke ;
Gibson, Kimberly ;
Schoemann, Alexander M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 18 (03) :285-300
[27]   Relations among Personality Characteristics, Environmental Events, Coping Behavior and Adolescents' Life Satisfaction [J].
Lyons, Michael D. ;
Huebner, E. Scott ;
Hills, Kimberly J. .
JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2016, 17 (03) :1033-1050
[28]   Sample size in factor analysis [J].
MacCallum, RC ;
Widaman, KF ;
Zhang, SB ;
Hong, SH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1999, 4 (01) :84-99
[29]   NEO-FFI: Psychometric Properties of a Short Personality Inventory in Portuguese Context [J].
Magalhaes, Eunice ;
Salgueira, Ana ;
Gonzalez, Antonio-Jose ;
Costa, Jose Joaquim ;
Costa, Manuel Joao ;
Costa, Patricio ;
de Lima, Margarida Pedroso .
PSICOLOGIA-REFLEXAO E CRITICA, 2014, 27 (04) :642-657
[30]  
Moreira JM, 2016, REV IBEROAM DIAGN EV, V1, P132