Farmers' Livelihood Differentiation and Pesticide Application: Empirical Evidence from a Causal Mediation Analysis

被引:7
作者
Cai, Liangmei [1 ]
Wang, Linping [2 ]
Ning, Manxiu [2 ]
机构
[1] Ningde Normal Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Ningde 352100, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Fuzhou 350002, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
pesticide overuse; farmers' livelihood differentiation; land resource endowment; Chinese farm households;
D O I
10.3390/su14148502
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As agriculture is becoming a less reliable source of income, many farmers are turning to other industries to supplement their lackluster profits from farming in a process known as farmers' livelihood differentiation. Despite the existence of a voluminous literature on farmers' livelihood differentiation, little is known about its effect on agricultural production behavior. To fill this knowledge gap, this study uses rice planting data from 537 Chinese farm households to analyze how farmers' livelihood differentiation affects pesticide application among rural farmers in China. This study not only examines the effects of farmers' livelihood differentiation on farmers' pesticide application, but also underscores the potential pathways behind the effects of farmers' livelihood differentiation according to land resource endowment via a causal mediation analysis. The results showed that (1) farmers' livelihood differentiation had a direct effect on the amount of pesticide use. Compared to the full-time agricultural households, regular part-time farmers and ir-regular part-time farmers generally tend to use lower levels of pesticides. (2) The mediating effect of farmers' livelihood differentiation on pesticide use was through land resource endowment. Compared to the full-time agricultural households, ir-regular part-time farmers reduce their pesticide use through maintaining better land resource endowment, while regular part-time farmers increase their pesticide application by maintaining poor land resource endowment. These results may provide important implications for policymakers to improve cultivated land protection policies and encourage the use of soil testing technology to determine the formulation of the fertilizer used in the agricultural ecological environment.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Adoption of Contract Farming and Precautionary Savings to Manage the Catastrophic Risk of Maize Farming: Evidence from Bangladesh
    Adnan, K. M. Mehedi
    Ying, Liu
    Sarker, Swati Anindita
    Hafeez, Muhammad
    Razzaq, Amar
    Raza, Muhammad Haseeb
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (01):
  • [2] Bondoc I., EUROPEAN REGULATION
  • [3] Cai R., 2019, China Rural Surv, V1, P51
  • [4] Chen C.H., 1999, CHIN RURAL EC, V4, P3
  • [5] Chen P., 2018, MOD EC RES, V08, P112, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1009-2382.2018.08.015
  • [6] Chen X., 2016, PESTICIDE SCI ADM, P4
  • [7] Chen Yin-rong, 2020, Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, V32, P2261, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.12.18
  • [8] Understanding cognitive and socio-psychological factors determining farmers' intentions to use improved grassland: Implications of land use policy for sustainable pasture production
    Elahi, Ehsan
    Zhang, Hongxia
    Xing Lirong
    Khalid, Zainab
    Xu, Haiyun
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 102
  • [9] Agricultural advisory and financial services; farm level access, outreach and impact in a mixed cropping district of Punjab, Pakistan
    Elahi, Ehsan
    Abid, Muhammad
    Zhang, Liqin
    ul Haq, Shams
    Sahito, Jam Ghulam Murtaza
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 71 : 249 - 260
  • [10] Gao J.J., 2019, Chin. Rural. Econ, V11, P83