The Interaction Effect between ESG and Green Innovation and Its Impact on Firm Value from the Perspective of Information Disclosure

被引:128
作者
Zhang, Fen [1 ]
Qin, Xiaonan [1 ]
Liu, Lina [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Normal Univ, Sch Business, Jinan 250358, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
green innovation; ESG disclosure; social responsibility; firm value; quantile regression; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; LISTED COMPANIES; GOVERNANCE; INVESTMENT; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.3390/su12051866
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Few studies have been conducted on whether the coexistence of green innovation and corporate social responsibility (CSR) has a favorable interaction effect on firm value. This interaction effect is of great significance for enterprises balancing resource allocation between two factors in the future. Meanwhile, information disclosure can reflect the efforts of enterprises in taking on CSR. Therefore, taking China's listed companies as an example, this paper studies the interaction effect of CSR after being divided into the three different dimensions of environment, society, and governance (ESG) and green innovation on firm value. The quantile regression method can reflect the impact of CSR and green innovation on the firm value of different levels. The study finds that: (1) green innovation can promote the improvement of medium- and high-level firm value; (2) only the disclosure of environmental and social information can have a positive impact on firm value; (3) the interaction effect between green innovation and social disclosure on firm value is a substitution effect, which will gradually weaken with the increase of firm value. This paper proposes that relevant departments should guide green funds into enterprises with capital constraints to alleviate the issue of fund crowding into CSR and green innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Moderating effect of innovation on corporate social responsibility and firm performance in realm of sustainable development [J].
Anser, Muhammad Khalid ;
Zhang, Zhihe ;
Kanwal, Lubna .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (05) :799-806
[2]   Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data [J].
Aouadi A. ;
Marsat S. .
Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 151 (4) :1027-1047
[3]  
Backhaus K.B., 2002, Business and Society, V41, P292, DOI DOI 10.1177/0007650302041003003
[4]  
BRAINARD WC, 1968, AM ECON REV, V58, P99
[5]   Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures [J].
Brammer, Stephen ;
Brooks, Chris ;
Pavelin, Stephen .
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 35 (03) :97-116
[6]   Environmental, social, and governance and company profitability: Are financial intermediaries different? [J].
Brogi, Marina ;
Lagasio, Valentina .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (03) :576-587
[7]   Corporate social responsibility: a crossroad between changing values, innovation and internationalisation [J].
Carrasco-Monteagudo, Inmaculada ;
Buendia-Martinez, Inmaculada .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 7 (03) :295-314
[8]   CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCESS TO FINANCE [J].
Cheng, Beiting ;
Ioannou, Ioannis ;
Serafeim, George .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (01) :1-23
[9]  
Coluccia D, EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT
[10]   Economic impact analysis of natural gas development and the policy implications [J].
De Silva, P. N. K. ;
Simons, S. J. R. ;
Stevens, P. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 88 :639-651