A study on the functional uses of textual pragmatic markers by native speakers and English-medium instruction learners

被引:7
作者
Ament, Jennifer [1 ]
Baron Pares, Julia [2 ,3 ]
Perez-Vidal, Carmen [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Lletres & Filosofia, Edif B,Carrer Fortuna,Campus UAB, E-08193 Barcelona, Cerdanyola Del, Spain
[2] Univ Int Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Pragmatic markers; Textual markers; English-medium instruction; Second language acquisition; DISCOURSE MARKERS; ORAL PROFICIENCY; LANGUAGE; ACQUISITION; BUSINESS; COMPETENCE; SPEECH; ABROAD; WELL;
D O I
10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.009
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This study aims at describing and comparing the distribution of pragmatic marker (PM) use by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) speakers and English native speakers (NSs). To do this, the effect of increased contact with English, via English-medium instruction (EMI), on the use of textual PMs in learner's oral communication was explored. A functional-pragmatic approach was taken to the analysis of PMs. Textual PMs were examined due to the high frequency of these markers in the EMI setting. Participants were second-year (N=23), and third-year (N=18) business undergraduates, and a NS control group (N=10). Data were collected through two oral tasks. Results indicate that the groups used PMs for causal, contrast and sequential functions at similar frequencies, and that the NSs used PMs significantly more often for continuation and elaboration functions and significantly less opening and closing functions compared to the EMI groups. The results suggest that EMI might facilitate the acquisition of some functions of PMs such as the use of causal, contrast, sequential and topic shift/digression markers whereas other PMs, such as elaboration markers, may take longer to acquire. Participation in a variety of contexts and explicit instruction might aid a more balanced use of textual PMs. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 53
页数:13
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: A framework for the use of metadiscourse [J].
Abdi, Reza ;
Rizi, Manoochehr Tavangar ;
Tavakoli, Mansoor .
JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2010, 42 (06) :1669-1679
[2]  
Aijmer KarinSimon-Vandenbergen., 2006, Pragmatic markers in contrast
[3]   I don't teach language The linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in SwedenI don't teach language" The linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in Sweden [J].
Airey, John .
AILA REVIEW, 2012, 25 (01) :64-79
[4]  
Ament J.R., 2015, Higher Learning Research Communications, V5, P47
[5]   The effects of English-medium instruction on the use of textual and interpersonal pragmatic markers [J].
Ament, Jennifer ;
Perez Vidal, Carmen ;
Baron Pares, Julia .
PRAGMATICS, 2018, 28 (04) :517-545
[6]  
Ament JenniferR., 2018, EUROSLA STUDIES, V1, P44
[7]  
Andersen G., 2000, Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation: A relevance theoretic approach to the language of adolescents
[8]  
[Anonymous], FRONT PSYCHOL LANG 8
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Relevance and Linguistic Meaning, The semantic and pragmatic of discourse markers
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The CHILDES project: The database