Comprehensive condition assessment of bridge decks by multimodal NDE

被引:0
作者
Gucunski, Nenad [1 ]
Feldmann, Ruediger [2 ]
Romero, Francisco [1 ]
Kruschwitz, Sabine [2 ]
Parvardeh, Hooman [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Adv Infrastruct & Transportat, 100 Brett Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] German Fed Inst Mat Res & Testing BAMy, D-12205 Berlin, Germany
来源
NONDESTRUCTIVE CHARACTERIZATION FOR COMPOSITE MATERIALS, AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE, AND HOMELAND SECURITY 2010 | 2010年 / 7649卷
关键词
bridge decks; concrete; deterioration; NDE; impact echo; ground penetrating radar; half-cell potential; electrical resistivity; ultrasonic surface waves; delamination; corrosion;
D O I
10.1117/12.848704
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Corrosion induced bridge deck delamination is a common problem in reinforced concrete decks. While condition assessment can be done using a number of traditional and NDE methods, the presented study concentrates on a complementary use of five NDE techniques: impact echo (IE), ground penetrating radar (GPR), half-cell potential (H-C), ultrasonic surface waves (USW) and electrical resistivity (ER). Each of the five techniques has its advantages and limitations. However, each of them can contribute to a more comprehensive assessment of the condition of a deck. For example, GPR can identify deteriorated bridge deck areas, while IE can accurately detect and characterize delaminations in the deck. USW, on the other hand, provides information about material degradation through a measurement of concrete elastic moduli. Finally, H-C will provide information about the likelihood for active corrosion, while ER will assess potential for corrosive environment. There are also secondary benefits of the use of the five techniques, like e. g. mapping of concrete cover from GPR surveys. A brief overview of the techniques and their complementary use illustrated by the results from deck testing on several bridges is presented. The presented surveys were conducted on both decks (typical thickness 7 to 9 inches) and slabs (typical thickness 14-20 inches), some with an additional PC overlay. Results include delamination maps from IE, attenuation maps from GPR, modulus distribution maps from USW, H-C potential maps, and resistivity maps from ER. Some of the results are validated through a series of "ground truth" measurements, like inspection of cores taken from the decks.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Algernon D., 2006, ASNTS NDE C CIV ENG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Impact-echo, Non-destructive evaluation of concrete and masonry
[3]   Ground-penetrating radar for network-level concrete deck repair management [J].
Barnes, CL ;
Trottier, JP .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2000, 126 (03) :257-262
[4]  
Browne R.D., 1980, INT C PERFORMANCE CO, P169
[5]  
El-Safty A., 2008, P 12 INT C STRUCT FA
[6]  
Elsner B., 2003, MAT STRUCTURES AUG, V36
[7]  
Gucunski N., 2005, 133 GSP ASCE, V133
[8]  
Gucunski N., 2000, Proceedings, Use of Geophysical Methods in Construction, P35, DOI DOI 10.1061/40521(296)3
[9]  
Gucunski Nenad., 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2050, P11
[10]  
MASER KR, 1992, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1347, P25